-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6k
8356556: AArch64: No need for acquire fence in safepoint poll in FFM #25829
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8356556: AArch64: No need for acquire fence in safepoint poll in FFM #25829
Conversation
👋 Welcome back toxaart! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@toxaart This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 33 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@pchilano, @dholmes-ora) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall looks good, but one nit.
Thanks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Thanks
/integrate |
It also looks good. |
Going to push as commit c1deb9e.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
/sponsor |
@theRealAph The command |
Hi, please consider the following changes:
On AArch64, the
acquire
bool argument of thesafepoint_poll()
method is removed, as the load-acquireldar
instruction in thesafepoint_poll()
implementation is not needed completely. It was used for observing the disarmed value when VMThread was used to disarm the Java threads, but currently JavaThreads disarm themselves.Tested in tiers 1 - 4.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25829/head:pull/25829
$ git checkout pull/25829
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25829
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25829/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25829
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25829
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25829.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment