8365264: Rename ResourceHashtable to HashTable

[jdksjolen]

Hi,

This PR renames ResourceHashtable to HashTable. The "resource" part of the name isn't true anymore, it does many types of allocations. The RHT should be HT to signify that it's the default choice of hashtable in Hotspot.

I didn't change any copyright years for this change.

Thanks

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8365264: Rename ResourceHashtable to HashTable (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

• Albert Mingkun Yang (@albertnetymk - Reviewer) Review applies to 5c58e011
• Ioi Lam (@iklam - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26729/head:pull/26729
$ git checkout pull/26729

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26729
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26729/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26729

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26729

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26729.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back jsjolen! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@jdksjolen This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8365264: Rename ResourceHashtable to HashTable

Reviewed-by: iklam, ayang

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 82 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 001aaa1: 8365166: ARM32: missing os::fetch_bcp_from_context implementation
• f3b34d3: 8359235: C1 compilation fails with "assert(is_single_stack() && !is_virtual()) failed: type check"
• e77cdd9: 8364570: Remove LockingMode related code from riscv64
• ... and 79 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/ba0ae4cb28aa520d5244077349e35ef1bb475b61...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[openjdk]

@jdksjolen The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• graal
• hotspot
• serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 04: Full - Incremental (eb5a4ea6)
• 03: Full - Incremental (5c58e011)
• 02: Full - Incremental (4e143035)
• 01: Full - Incremental (c7ce8dea)
• 00: Full (fa1794d0)

[jdksjolen]

Aha, of course I forgot about re-sorting the headers.

[iklam]

hashtable.hpp should become hashTable.hpp, which defines the type HashTable. (Existing example: concurrentHashTable.hpp defines the type ConcurrentHashTable).

resizeableResourceHash.hpp should be renamed to resizeableHashTable.hpp

[jdksjolen]

hashtable.hpp should become hashTable.hpp, which defines the type HashTable. (Existing example: concurrentHashTable.hpp defines the type ConcurrentHashTable).

resizeableResourceHash.hpp should be renamed to resizeableHashTable.hpp

Done!

[iklam]

LGTM

[jdksjolen]

Cheers!

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 4680dc9.
Since your change was applied there have been 85 commits pushed to the master branch:

• ecbdd34: 8361103: java_lang_Thread::async_get_stack_trace does not properly protect JavaThread
• 38a2614: 8365265: x86 short forward jump exceeds 8-bit offset in methodHandles_x86.cpp when using Intel APX
• 899e13f: 8364434: Inconsistent BufferedContext state after GC
• ... and 82 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/ba0ae4cb28aa520d5244077349e35ef1bb475b61...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@jdksjolen Pushed as commit 4680dc9.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.