Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch cinder uniquePodNames to true for DCN deployments #481

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

fmount
Copy link
Contributor

@fmount fmount commented Jan 24, 2025

This patch reverts the work done in [1], where uniquePodNames
was added as a kustomization parameter for Cinder and switched
to false due to [2].
In addition, this patch fixes the way extraMounts Ceph secrets
are accessed, and removes the not required projected key.

[1] #436
[2] https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPRH-11240

Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPRH-11240

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from fultonj and karelyatin January 24, 2025 08:51
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 24, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fmount
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign leifmadsen for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@fmount fmount requested a review from tosky January 24, 2025 08:51
@tosky
Copy link
Contributor

tosky commented Jan 24, 2025

Do we want to set it explicitly to true, or remove it completely, thus relying on its default value and fully reverting #436 ?
Also, a bit more details in the commit message wouldn't hurt.

@fmount fmount force-pushed the unique_pm branch 2 times, most recently from 512fde1 to c873f30 Compare January 24, 2025 10:51
@fmount
Copy link
Contributor Author

fmount commented Jan 24, 2025

Do we want to set it explicitly to true, or remove it completely, thus relying on its default value and fully reverting #436 ? Also, a bit more details in the commit message wouldn't hurt.

Hi @tosky, I'm ok to revert #436 entirely. I added a couple of minor changes in the way we resolve the extraMounts secret but they are not strictly necessary.

This patch reverts the work done in [1], where uniquePodNames
was added as a kustomization parameter for cinder and switched
to false due to [2].
In addition, this patch fixes the way extraMounts Ceph secrets
are accessed, and removes the not required "projected" key.

[1] openstack-k8s-operators#436
[2] https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPRH-11240

Signed-off-by: Francesco Pantano <[email protected]>
@fmount
Copy link
Contributor Author

fmount commented Jan 24, 2025

Do we want to set it explicitly to true, or remove it completely, thus relying on its default value and fully reverting #436 ? Also, a bit more details in the commit message wouldn't hurt.

Hi @tosky, I'm ok to revert #436 entirely. I added a couple of minor changes in the way we resolve the extraMounts secret but they are not strictly necessary.

Done

@fultonj
Copy link
Contributor

fultonj commented Jan 24, 2025

Looks fine to me. Waiting for test results before merging.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants