DEPS: Bump optional dependencies #60655
Conversation
This reverts commit e689e1b.
|
Looks good - maybe worth holding off until after 2.3 gets released? |
|
This pull request is stale because it has been open for thirty days with no activity. Please update and respond to this comment if you're still interested in working on this. |
| clipboard = ['PyQt5>=5.15.9', 'qtpy>=2.3.0'] | ||
| compression = ['zstandard>=0.19.0'] | ||
| compression = ['zstandard>=0.22.0'] | ||
| timezone = ['pytz>=2023.4'] | ||
| all = ['adbc-driver-postgresql>=0.10.0', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Slightly tangential but the adbc driver libraries are all released at the same time. Not sure how we got a minimum for SQLite of 0.8.0 and postgresql at 0.10.0, but should probably bump the former to match the latter
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sure thing. I tried at least moving these installs to conda-forge in 39cdaf1 but I was getting some openssl dependency conflicts. I'll try again with bumping these version in the coming weeks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There is still an open issue on windows for using conda-forge, so I'd suggest punting that until fixed upstream. See apache/arrow-adbc#1149
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hmm I see that that the conda forge packages are noarch now so I think they should work on Windows now? https://anaconda.org/conda-forge/adbc-driver-postgresql/files?page=2
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Perhaps that worked for early versions of arrow-adbc (I see those go up to 0.5.0) but at the moment there is no way for these to be architecture independent
|
Doesn't seem like the WIndows ADBC issue is going to be fixed anytime soon (at least based on the issue activity). Should we move forward and merge this with the working versions? |
These should have been out for at least ~1 year once pandas 3.0 comes out