Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add the slave-only instance configuration option to statime-linux #608

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2025

Conversation

rnijveld
Copy link
Member

@rnijveld rnijveld commented Feb 6, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 6, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 80.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 62.47%. Comparing base (cf40195) to head (4e12eb4).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
statime-linux/src/main.rs 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #608      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   62.46%   62.47%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          62       62              
  Lines        8290     8294       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits         5178     5182       +4     
  Misses       3112     3112              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@rnijveld rnijveld changed the base branch from dev-0.2.3 to main February 6, 2025 11:29
@rnijveld rnijveld force-pushed the add-slave-only-config branch from 63dc371 to 77fe1a2 Compare February 6, 2025 14:16
@rnijveld rnijveld force-pushed the add-slave-only-config branch from 77fe1a2 to 4e12eb4 Compare February 6, 2025 14:21
@davidv1992 davidv1992 added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 6, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 6610c64 Feb 6, 2025
4 checks passed
@davidv1992 davidv1992 deleted the add-slave-only-config branch February 6, 2025 14:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants