closes #143 Navitas R blog #150
Merged
Task list completed / task-list-completed
succeeded
May 2, 2024 in 0s
9 / 9 tasks completed
All tasks have been completed
Details
Required Tasks
| Task | Status |
|---|---|
| Place Closes #<insert_issue_number> into the beginning of your Pull Request Title (Use Edit button in top-right if you need to update), and make sure the corresponding issue is linked in the Development section on the right hand side | Completed |
Run the script from CICD.R line by line to first check the spelling in your post and then to make sure your code is compatible with our code-style. Address any incongruences by following the instructions in the file! |
Completed |
Choose (possibly several) tag(s) or categories from the current list: c("Metadata", "SDTM", "ADaM", "TLG", "Shiny", "Community", "Conferences", "Submissions", "Technical") for your blog post. If you cannot find anything that fits your blog post, add your own tag! We occasionally tidy up all tags for consistency. |
Completed |
Add a short description for your blog post in the description field at the top of the markdown document. |
Completed |
| Blog post is short, personalized, reproducible and readable | Completed |
| Add a disclaimer at the top of your post, if appropriate (example: Disclaimer | |
| This blog contains opinions that are of the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect the strategy of their respective organizations.) | Completed |
| Address all merge conflicts and resolve appropriately | Completed |
| Assign two of us (@bms63, @manciniedoardo, @StefanThoma, @kaz462) as reviewers in the PR. | Completed |
| Pat yourself on the back for a job well done! Much love to your accomplishment! | Completed |
| Added ® after any mention of SAS and removed mention of SAS “high cost” as such negative wording would not be suitable to place in a public blog in my opinion | Incomplete |
| Removed the dual programming section as don’t think it added any value for this blog to show that same table can be created in SAS or R | Incomplete |
| Added reference to pharmaverse as otherwise why post this blog on our site | Incomplete |
| I updated some of the wording such as R “usage is currently below par” as I don’t actually think it’s true – some of the blog reads more like a viewpoint from 2-3 years ago compared to the growing momentum we now see in R in our industry | Incomplete |
| Removed “The notable difference between SAS® and R is that SAS® is proprietary software, whereas R is an open-source programming language” as I feel readers would know this | Incomplete |
| Added reference to R consortium R submissions WG | Incomplete |
| I replaced the package examples given with pharmaverse examples as again this is a pharmaverse blog | Incomplete |
| Mentioned R Validation Hub rather than R Foundation for more specificity | Incomplete |
| Added a note on licensing | Incomplete |
| Learning curve of R removed “steep” and “lacks direct support from the company,” as those are not the case in many of the across-industry experiences I’ve seen | Incomplete |
| Added some images to help brighten the blog | Incomplete |
Loading