100% test coverage

[blakeembrey]

Fixing up 100% test coverage cases, additionally shifting some bytes around for readability and size (mainly the .map to a for loop to make the recursive case more obvious).

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (4a91505) to head (3246bc9).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #396      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   99.17%   100.00%   +0.82%     
===========================================
  Files           1         1              
  Lines         364       379      +15     
  Branches      130       136       +6     
===========================================
+ Hits          361       379      +18     
+ Misses          3         0       -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[blakeembrey]

Pulled name function out (which adds bytes) because it's needed to avoid a crash on name being missing before the token type error.

[blakeembrey]

[jonchurch]

Requested myself so I can find it again if I dont get to it after the tc meeting