Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added windows CI #77

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Added windows CI #77

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

karthik
Copy link
Contributor

@karthik karthik commented Aug 12, 2014

This PR will add Windows CI to the package. So in addition to what Travis accomplishes, you'll get something similar from appveyor. You may not want to merge for now, at least until you can fix the issue that make the build fail (it does now). I'll leave it up to the Toby (or anyone else) whether or not to merge this.

This should add windows CI in addition to what Travis provides.
@xsaintmleux
Copy link

Why are other branches also using AppVeyor already? Where can I find the Travis results?

e.g.: see last build here:
https://github.com/ropensci/plotly/compare/xsm-ggplotbuild-complete

@xsaintmleux
Copy link

@karthik all branches now use AppVeyor and show failures. Is it possible to put this aside and use only Travis until we fix the timezone issue?

@karthik
Copy link
Contributor Author

karthik commented Aug 15, 2014

I'll remove appveyor from the other branches for now. Sorry @xsaintmleux

@karthik
Copy link
Contributor Author

karthik commented Aug 15, 2014

It is now set to ONLY build on the appveyor branch and not any of the others.
cc/ @mkcor

@cpsievert
Copy link
Collaborator

I'm seeing an appveyor failure in #226. Not sure what exactly is causing it, but closing this temporarily to see if it fixes it.

@cpsievert cpsievert closed this Jul 31, 2015
@cpsievert cpsievert deleted the appveyor branch December 18, 2015 18:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants