Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DOWNSTREAM TEST][PLATFORM]Test: Upgrade pulumi/{pkg,sdk} to 76e8ff4fb739ed0d4918d09a729c86d93d522323 #5191

Conversation

pulumi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR was generated via $ upgrade-provider pulumi/pulumi-aws --kind=bridge --pr-reviewers=lunaris --pr-title-prefix=[DOWNSTREAM TEST][PLATFORM] --target-pulumi-version=76e8ff4fb739ed0d4918d09a729c86d93d522323.


  • Updating Java Gen version from 1.1.0 to 1.3.0.

This is a downstream codegen test for pulumi/pulumi#18454. (run-id: 13261823919)

@pulumi-bot pulumi-bot requested a review from lunaris February 11, 2025 12:19
Copy link

Does the PR have any schema changes?

Looking good! No breaking changes found.
No new resources/functions.

Maintainer note: consult the runbook for dealing with any breaking changes.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 11, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 24.54%. Comparing base (6ed1eed) to head (01f2275).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
sdk/go/aws/lambda/permission.go 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #5191   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   24.54%   24.54%           
=======================================
  Files         362      362           
  Lines      144734   144734           
=======================================
  Hits        35524    35524           
  Misses     109112   109112           
  Partials       98       98           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@pulumi-bot pulumi-bot closed this Feb 11, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant