Skip to content

Disable ROCm support in the Linux wheels build workflow #2124

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 24, 2025

Conversation

petrex
Copy link
Collaborator

@petrex petrex commented Apr 24, 2025

TLDR: disable ROCm wheel build to investigate regression from #2044

This pull request includes a small change to the .github/workflows/build_wheels_linux.yml file. The change disables the ROCm build by setting with-rocm to disable instead of enable.

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Apr 24, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/ao/2124

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 1 New Failure

As of commit 79deb7a with merge base 31d17c0 (image):

NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Apr 24, 2025
@petrex petrex added the topic: not user facing Use this tag if you don't want this PR to show up in release notes label Apr 24, 2025
@petrex petrex merged commit 1d46329 into pytorch:main Apr 24, 2025
32 of 35 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ciflow/rocm CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. module: rocm topic: not user facing Use this tag if you don't want this PR to show up in release notes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants