Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Validate that method inputs have the expected dim order #9757

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

GregoryComer
Copy link
Member

Summary:
Currently, there is no check for the correct dim order when setting method inputs. If the input tensor has a different dim order than was used in export, it will silently give garbage outputs by treating the input tensor as having a different dim order than it does. To catch this case, I've added an additional check in method.set_input to enforce that the dim order matches.

I've also added a dim_order_to_c_string utility method in "dim_order_util.h" to aid in printing usable error messages.

Differential Revision: D72106471

Summary:
Currently, there is no check for the correct dim order when setting method inputs. If the input tensor has a different dim order than was used in export, it will silently give garbage outputs by treating the input tensor as having a different dim order than it does. To catch this case, I've added an additional check in `method.set_input` to enforce that the dim order matches.

I've also added a `dim_order_to_c_string` utility method in "dim_order_util.h" to aid in printing usable error messages.

Differential Revision: D72106471
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Mar 29, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/9757

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 1 New Failure

As of commit faa7591 with merge base 7d35c68 (image):

NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Mar 29, 2025
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D72106471

Copy link

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your changes are user facing and intended to be a part of release notes, please use a label starting with release notes:.

If not, please add the topic: not user facing label.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants