Skip to content

get rid of unncessary fx wrap in regrouping #2882

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ZhengkaiZ
Copy link
Contributor

Summary: [torchrec] get rid of unncessary fx wrap in regrouping

Differential Revision: D72884977

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Apr 11, 2025
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D72884977

ZhengkaiZ added a commit to ZhengkaiZ/torchrec that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2025
Summary:

[torchrec] get rid of unncessary fx wrap in regrouping

Reviewed By: taylorKempWork, FulinHuang

Differential Revision: D72884977
ZhengkaiZ added a commit to ZhengkaiZ/torchrec that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2025
Summary:

[torchrec] get rid of unncessary fx wrap in regrouping

Reviewed By: taylorKempWork, FulinHuang

Differential Revision: D72884977
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D72884977

ZhengkaiZ added a commit to ZhengkaiZ/torchrec that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2025
Summary:

[torchrec] get rid of unncessary fx wrap in regrouping

Reviewed By: taylorKempWork, FulinHuang

Differential Revision: D72884977
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D72884977

Copy link

@cp2923 cp2923 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Double check, is there a test plan? Or existing UTs are sufficient

@ZhengkaiZ
Copy link
Contributor Author

Double check, is there a test plan? Or existing UTs are sufficient

Yes, existing test case already covered it

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D72884977

ZhengkaiZ added a commit to ZhengkaiZ/torchrec that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2025
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#2882

[torchrec] get rid of unncessary fx wrap in regrouping

Reviewed By: jingsh, taylorKempWork, FulinHuang

Differential Revision: D72884977
ZhengkaiZ added a commit to ZhengkaiZ/torchrec that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2025
Summary:

[torchrec] get rid of unncessary fx wrap in regrouping

Reviewed By: jingsh, taylorKempWork, FulinHuang

Differential Revision: D72884977
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D72884977

Summary:

[torchrec] get rid of unncessary fx wrap in regrouping

Reviewed By: jingsh, taylorKempWork, FulinHuang

Differential Revision: D72884977
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D72884977

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants