Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Gift transaction event, map timeline events using customerSupportChat payload when available #184

Draft
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

NiklasRosenstein
Copy link
Collaborator

@NiklasRosenstein NiklasRosenstein commented Feb 11, 2025

This PR addresses #183 to process the timelineDetailV2 object for a TR gift that was sent by the user (I cannot test it the other way around since I have not received a gift on my account).

It does so by, instead of relying on the timelineDetailV2 "id" field, which seems to differ from the corresponding timeline event object in this particular case, but instead to use the customerSupportChat payload's timelineEventId if it is available. Overall, this should make the timeline detail processing more robust.

I've also started to add type hints on the new code that I introduced here.

@NiklasRosenstein NiklasRosenstein added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 11, 2025
@@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ class EventType(Enum):
"SAVINGS_PLAN_INVOICE_CREATED": ConditionalEventType.TRADE_INVOICE,
"benefits_spare_change_execution": ConditionalEventType.TRADE_INVOICE,
"TRADE_INVOICE": ConditionalEventType.TRADE_INVOICE,
# Gifting
"GIFTER_TRANSACTION": PPEventType.TRANSFER_OUT,
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not exactly sure yet if this is the right category to assign it to. In the export_transactions result, it will be labelled as Transfer (Outbound).

Comment on lines +139 to +141
self.log.warning("Missing timeline event %r for detail: %s", timeline_event_id, json.dumps(response))
self.skipped_detail += 1
return
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now that I have a better understanding of this code, I think this code makes more sense than what I introduced in #161.

@NiklasRosenstein NiklasRosenstein linked an issue Feb 11, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@NiklasRosenstein NiklasRosenstein added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Feb 11, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Include Gift event in transaction
1 participant