-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Syncing latest changes from upstream master for rook #637
Conversation
Creating a cluster never succeeds if CSI driver is disabled So to fix that we need to always create the csi configmap closes: rook#14123 Signed-off-by: parth-gr <[email protected]>
Some function names in the comments do not match. This PR will fix such problems. Signed-off-by: findmyhappy <[email protected]>
csi: create csi configmap if csi controller is disabled
core: fix function names in comment
delete duplicate words and revise the names of some methods Signed-off-by: momantech <[email protected]>
Below sidecars are updated with latest available versions csi-node-driver-registrar: v2.10.1 csi-resizer: v1.10.1 csi-provisioner: v4.0.1 csi-attacher: v4.5.1 csi-snapshotter: v7.0.2 Signed-off-by: Praveen M <[email protected]>
…rsions csi: update csi sidecars image version
docs: delete duplicate words and revise the names of some methods
in case of portable mons, mon scaledown was skipped with below code ``` if mon.NodeName == "" { logger.Debugf("mon %q is not scheduled to a specific host", mon.DaemonName) continue } ``` which skips mon removal if mon nodeName is empty but if mons are scale down in case of portable mons in that case also we want to remove extra mons to match the cephCluster configuration. Signed-off-by: subhamkrai <[email protected]>
mon: fix mon scaledown when mons are portable
This PR will add separate directory to handle the external manifest. Here external manifests will have same namespace (rook-ceph) for external cluster. Signed-off-by: smoshiur1237 <[email protected]>
external: Restructure external cluster examples manifests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: df-build-team, subhamkrai The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
PR containing the latest commits from upstream master branch