Add Service Mappings to Sigma Event Logs #1
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This Adds Mappings to Events Based on their Service Name. It maps Service Name to a Log Provider Cutting Down on False Positives Dramatically.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Based on my comment at WithSecureLabs#122 I decided to try implementing more service mappings and providers. I used thor.yml for inspiration and based on my tests so far it seems promising as a solution to WithSecureLabs#122. Let me know what you think.
I did leave out some including System, Application and PowerShell due to not being sure what the Provider Name is for System and Application. I presume they are both the same name as their title?
For PowerShell I was unsure how to represent multiple Providers so I chose to leave that one for now. I did attempt multiple providers with a problematic rule at the bottom of the commit but I am unsure if it is correct