Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updates code and version #49

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Updates code and version #49

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

robert-nemet
Copy link
Owner

@robert-nemet robert-nemet commented Dec 10, 2023

Describe your changes

My changes ....

Issue ticket number and link

Checklist before requesting a review

  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

PR Description

🤖 Generated by PR Agent at 11a8e32

This PR includes two main changes:

  • Refactoring the logic in the webhook.go file to improve the handling of user exclusions in the 'exclude' function and to change the 'match' variable declaration in the 'Handle' function.
  • Updating the Go version used in the Dockerfile from 1.20 to 1.24.

PR Walkthrough

pr_agent:walkthrough

@robert-nemet
Copy link
Owner Author

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: The PR mainly focuses on updating the Go version and making some changes in the code logic.
  • 📝 PR summary: This PR updates the Go version from 1.20 to 1.24 in the Dockerfile. It also modifies the logic in the webhook.go file, particularly in the 'Handle' and 'exclude' functions.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 2, because the PR is relatively small and the changes are straightforward. However, the lack of tests increases the review effort slightly.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No

PR Feedback

  • 💡 General suggestions: It's good to see that you're keeping the codebase up to date with the latest Go version. However, it would be beneficial to provide more context in your commit messages and PR description. This will help reviewers understand the purpose and impact of your changes.

  • 🤖 Code feedback:
    • relevant file: pkg/webhook/webhook.go
      suggestion: Consider simplifying the logic in the 'exclude' function. The current nested conditionals are a bit hard to follow. You could use a switch statement or separate the conditions into different functions for clarity. [medium]
      relevant line: if name == "" {

    • relevant file: Dockerfile
      suggestion: It's good to see the Go version being updated. However, make sure to test the application thoroughly after such an update, as it might introduce breaking changes or incompatibilities. [important]
      relevant line: FROM golang:1.24 as builder

How to use

Instructions

Tag me in a comment '@robert-nemet' and add one of the following commands:
/review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
/describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
/add_docs: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
/generate_labels: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
see the tools guide for more details.

To edit any configuration parameter from the configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value.
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

@robert-nemet robert-nemet added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 10, 2023
@robert-nemet
Copy link
Owner Author

PR Description updated to latest commit (11a8e32)

Comment on lines +129 to 142
if name == "" {
if uid == "" {
return false
}
if uid != "" {
return uid == user.UID
}
}

if name != "" && uid == "" {
return names[len(names)-1] == name
}

if name == "" && uid != "" {
return uid == user.UID
}

return names[len(names)-1] == name && uid == user.UID
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggestion: Simplify the conditional logic in the 'exclude' function to improve readability.

Suggested change
if name == "" {
if uid == "" {
return false
}
if uid != "" {
return uid == user.UID
}
}
if name != "" && uid == "" {
return names[len(names)-1] == name
}
if name == "" && uid != "" {
return uid == user.UID
}
return names[len(names)-1] == name && uid == user.UID
if name == "" {
return uid == user.UID
}
if uid == "" {
return names[len(names)-1] == name
}
return names[len(names)-1] == name && uid == user.UID

@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ func (v *validator) Handle(ctx context.Context, req admission.Request) admission
if exclude(lock.Spec.Exclusive, requester) {
return admission.Allowed(fmt.Sprintf("allowed. excluded from the lock[user %v, lock %v]", requester.Username, lock))
}
match := true
var match = true
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggestion: Use a short variable declaration for 'match' in the 'Handle' function to maintain consistency with the rest of the code.

Suggested change
var match = true
match := true

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
# Build the manager binary
FROM golang:1.20 as builder
FROM golang:1.24 as builder
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggestion: Add a comment to explain why the Go version is being updated to 1.24.

Suggested change
FROM golang:1.24 as builder
# Updating Go version to 1.24 for improved performance and new features
FROM golang:1.24 as builder

@robert-nemet
Copy link
Owner Author

@CodiumAI-Agent /ask is this ok pr?

@CodiumAI-Agent
Copy link

Question: is this ok pr?

Answer:
Based on the provided PR, it seems to be well-structured and follows good practices. The changes made in the code are clear and the PR description provides a good overview of the changes. However, there are a few points to consider:

  1. In the webhook.go file, the match variable declaration has been changed from match := true to var match = true. This change doesn't seem to have any significant impact on the code as both declarations are equivalent in Go. If there's a specific reason for this change, it would be helpful to mention it in the PR description.

  2. The refactoring of the exclude function seems to improve the readability and logic of the code. It now checks for empty name and uid separately, which makes the function easier to understand.

  3. The Go version has been updated in the Dockerfile from 1.20 to 1.24. This is a good practice to keep the project up-to-date with the latest stable versions. However, it's important to ensure that this doesn't introduce any breaking changes in the project.

  4. The PR description mentions that the changes have been thoroughly tested, especially for core features. It's important to ensure that all tests pass after the changes, and if possible, to add new tests that cover the new logic.

  5. The PR description could be improved by providing more details about the changes, especially the refactoring in the webhook.go file. It would be helpful to explain why these changes were necessary and how they improve the code.

In conclusion, this PR seems to be generally well done, but could benefit from a more detailed description and justification for the changes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants