Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Field definitions are not limited to current schema #206

Conversation

joschug
Copy link

@joschug joschug commented Oct 11, 2021

The current implementation doesn't work correctly if the argument has a fully-qualified type from another schema, e.g.

procedure p1(p_file sys.utl_file.file_type);

This PR corrects this issue by using the type_owner instead of the current schema when looking up the field definition.

@joschug
Copy link
Author

joschug commented Oct 11, 2021

This is related to issue #204.

@joschug joschug closed this Oct 27, 2021
@joschug
Copy link
Author

joschug commented Oct 27, 2021

Included in #208

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant