Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: sfmc v2 onboarding #4009

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

feat: sfmc v2 onboarding #4009

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

ItsSudip
Copy link
Member

What are the changes introduced in this PR?

We are onboarding a new destination named sfmc v2

What is the related Linear task?

Resolves INT-3121

Please explain the objectives of your changes below

Put down any required details on the broader aspect of your changes. If there are any dependent changes, mandatorily mention them here

Any changes to existing capabilities/behaviour, mention the reason & what are the changes ?

N/A

Any new dependencies introduced with this change?

N/A

Any new generic utility introduced or modified. Please explain the changes.

N/A

Any technical or performance related pointers to consider with the change?

N/A

@coderabbitai review


Developer checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project

  • No breaking changes are being introduced.

  • All related docs linked with the PR?

  • All changes manually tested?

  • Any documentation changes needed with this change?

  • Is the PR limited to 10 file changes?

  • Is the PR limited to one linear task?

  • Are relevant unit and component test-cases added in new readability format?

Reviewer checklist

  • Is the type of change in the PR title appropriate as per the changes?

  • Verified that there are no credentials or confidential data exposed with the changes.

@ItsSudip ItsSudip marked this pull request as ready for review January 30, 2025 10:17
@ItsSudip ItsSudip requested review from a team and sivashanmukh as code owners January 30, 2025 10:17
export const SUPPORTED_EVENT_TYPE = 'record';
export const ACTION_TYPES = ['insert', 'delete', 'update'];
export const ENDPOINTS = {
GET_TOKEN: `auth.marketingcloudapis.com/v2/token`,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

template strings are not required here

src/cdk/v2/destinations/sfmc_v2/procWorkflow.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/cdk/v2/destinations/sfmc_v2/procWorkflow.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/cdk/v2/destinations/sfmc_v2/procWorkflow.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/cdk/v2/destinations/sfmc_v2/utils.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -0,0 +1,650 @@
export const contactTests = [
{
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

trying to reduce code duplication in call test cases

@ItsSudip ItsSudip requested a review from a team as a code owner February 4, 2025 05:32
@devops-github-rudderstack
Copy link
Contributor

Allure Test reports for this run are available at:

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.01%. Comparing base (ee33e5c) to head (85f64c1).
Report is 9 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #4009      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    90.82%   91.01%   +0.18%     
===========================================
  Files          627      632       +5     
  Lines        32693    32858     +165     
  Branches      7765     7791      +26     
===========================================
+ Hits         29695    29906     +211     
+ Misses        2775     2733      -42     
+ Partials       223      219       -4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants