Repository navigation
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
community review
- The assert_ne changes are unrelated and just to get clippy to pass -> I already opened #3514 for that yesterday
- Does https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-bindgen/blob/3d7ec570ad932708c78a0e66d313bf17b1699854/CONTRIBUTING.md#cutting-a-new-bindgen-release need to be updated?
|
Regarding the second point, I don't think so! Stuff should work as before. This is essentially just an authentication change. |
|
Ok nevermind, the current release workflow is broken, it doesn't work. It has to be implemented in another way, I'll check in with the maintainers. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
6f0ebff to
3786215
Compare
3786215 to
e3389f0
Compare
|
This PR was rebased onto a different main commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed. Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers. |
|
Ok, I went back and forth on this a couple of times, the interaction with cargo-dist is tricky. I decided to just run |
|
Updated the docs. Though when doing that, I realized that they were actually out of date, as they described running the publish workflow manually, but that's not how it works right now (before this PR). I wonder if the manual publishing through clicking in GitHub UI actually wouldn't be a better choice for bindgen maintainers. Let's see what @emilio thinks. |
So that we can track the
bindgencrates inteam.CC @emilio @rust-lang/wg-bindgen
Companion PR: rust-lang/team#2848
After this PR is merged, the
CARGO_REGISTRY_TOKENsecret should be removed from this repository (and invalidated).