Skip to content

Chunked generic slice eq #116422

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions library/core/benches/slice.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -171,3 +171,17 @@ fn fold_to_last(b: &mut Bencher) {
let slice: &[i32] = &[0; 1024];
b.iter(|| black_box(slice).iter().fold(None, |_, r| Some(NonNull::from(r))));
}

#[bench]
fn slice_cmp_generic(b: &mut Bencher) {
#[derive(PartialEq, Clone, Copy)]
struct Foo(u32, u32);

let left = [Foo(128, 128); 128];
let right = [Foo(128, 128); 128];

b.iter(|| {
let (left, right) = (black_box(&left), black_box(&right));
left.as_slice() == right.as_slice()
});
}
46 changes: 45 additions & 1 deletion library/core/src/slice/cmp.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -60,7 +60,51 @@ where
return false;
}

self.iter().zip(other.iter()).all(|(x, y)| x == y)
if self.len() == 0 {
return true;
}

// ZSTs have no identity and slices don't guarantee which addresses-to-ZSTs they produce
// so we only need to compare them once to determine the behavior of the PartialEq impl
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The eq could still have side-effects though, no?

We have https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/1521-copy-clone-semantics.html to let us skip side-effects in clone sometimes, but I don't think we have a justification to skip side-effects in PartialEq.

if const { mem::size_of::<A>() == 0 && mem::size_of::<B>() == 0 } {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit:

Suggested change
if const { mem::size_of::<A>() == 0 && mem::size_of::<B>() == 0 } {
if const { A::IS_ZST && B::IS_ZST } {

// zero-length slices are always equal
// SAFETY: A and B are ZSTs so it's ok to conjure them out of thin air
return unsafe { mem::zeroed::<A>() == mem::zeroed::<B>() };
}

const UNROLL: usize = 4;
let mut i = 0;
let mut is_eq = true;

let a = self.as_ptr();
let b = other.as_ptr();
let len = self.len();

// compare items 1 by 1 in case comparisons are expensive. at least one item, then
// until the remainder is a multiple of UNROLL
loop {
// SAFETY: slices are of the same length and loop conditions ensure indexes are in bounds
unsafe {
is_eq = is_eq & PartialEq::eq(&*a.add(i), &*b.add(i));
i = i.unchecked_add(1);
}

if !is_eq || i == len || (len - i) % UNROLL == 0 {
break;
}
}
while is_eq && i + UNROLL <= len {
// SAFETY: slices are of the same length and loop conditions ensure indexes are in bounds
unsafe {
is_eq = is_eq & PartialEq::eq(&*a.add(i), &*b.add(i));
is_eq = is_eq & PartialEq::eq(&*a.add(i + 1), &*b.add(i + 1));
is_eq = is_eq & PartialEq::eq(&*a.add(i + 2), &*b.add(i + 2));
is_eq = is_eq & PartialEq::eq(&*a.add(i + 3), &*b.add(i + 3));
i = i.unchecked_add(UNROLL);
}
}

is_eq
}
}

Expand Down