Skip to content

Fix effect predicates from item bounds in old solver #134638

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 24, 2024

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

r? lcnr

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 22, 2024
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

@lcnr lcnr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit, then r=me

<T as Trait>::Assoc::<U>::func();
//~^ ERROR the trait bound `<T as Trait>::Assoc<U>: ~const Trait` is not satisfied
//[current]~^ ERROR the trait bound `U: ~const Other` is not satisfied
//[next]~^^ ERROR the trait bound `<T as Trait>::Assoc<U>: ~const Trait` is not satisfied
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

deeply_normalize_for_diagnostics?

Copy link
Member Author

@compiler-errors compiler-errors Dec 23, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

<T as Trait>::Assoc<U> is not U. There's no normalization happening here -- that's a rigid alias. This is due to the fact that the proof tree looks like:

  • <T as Trait>::Assoc<U>: ~const Other proven via an item bound requires:
    • U: ~const Other

but we don't go deeper in the proof tree visitor b/c the nested obligation is not considered a where clause for the purposes of proof tree visitor. This may be fixed by #132345.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

Nothing to change here

@bors r=lcnr rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 23, 2024

📌 Commit 535bc78 has been approved by lcnr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 23, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 24, 2024
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#134638 (Fix effect predicates from item bounds in old solver)
 - rust-lang#134662 (Fix safety docs for `dyn Any + Send {+ Sync}`)
 - rust-lang#134689 (core: fix const ptr::swap_nonoverlapping when there are pointers at odd offsets)
 - rust-lang#134699 (Belay new reviews for workingjubilee)
 - rust-lang#134701 (Correctly note item kind in `NonConstFunctionCall` error message)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit c2f44cd into rust-lang:master Dec 24, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.85.0 milestone Dec 24, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 24, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#134638 - compiler-errors:fx-item-bounds, r=lcnr

Fix effect predicates from item bounds in old solver

r? lcnr
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants