Skip to content

Correct extract_if sample equivalent. #135734

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
12 changes: 7 additions & 5 deletions library/alloc/src/vec/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3656,20 +3656,22 @@ impl<T, A: Allocator> Vec<T, A> {
///
/// ```
/// # use std::cmp::min;
/// # let some_predicate = |x: &mut i32| { *x == 2 || *x == 3 || *x == 6 };
/// # let mut vec = vec![1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6];
/// # let range = 1..4;
/// # let some_predicate = |x: &mut i32| { *x % 2 == 1 };
/// # let mut vec = vec![0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6];
/// # let range = 1..5;
/// let mut i = range.start;
/// while i < min(vec.len(), range.end) {
/// let mut end = range.end;
/// while i < min(vec.len(), end) {
/// if some_predicate(&mut vec[i]) {
/// let val = vec.remove(i);
/// end -= 1;
Comment on lines +3663 to +3667
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't this a redundant op? end and vec.len() only ever change at the same time, so it should be possible to do something like while i < vec.len() - diff, where diff is vec.len() - range.end using the original vec.len().

/// // your code here
/// } else {
/// i += 1;
/// }
/// }
///
/// # assert_eq!(vec, vec![1, 4, 5]);
/// # assert_eq!(vec, vec![0, 2, 4, 5, 6]);
Comment on lines +3659 to +3674
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think it needs to exactly match the example below but it should match extract_if, could you add a check against this? Something like:

# let mut vec = vec![...];
# let mut vec2 = vec.clone();
# let mut extracted = vec![];

// ...

        // your code here
#       extracted.push(val);

// ...

# let extracted2 = vec2.extract_if(range, some_predicate).collect::<Vec<_>>();
# assert_eq!(vec, vec2);
# assert_eq!(extracted, extracted2);

/// ```
///
/// But `extract_if` is easier to use. `extract_if` is also more efficient,
Expand Down
Loading