implement eat_until leveraging memchr in lexer

[gvozdvmozgu]

No description provided.

[rustbot]

r? @lcnr

rustbot has assigned @lcnr.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

[rustbot]

These commits modify the Cargo.lock file. Unintentional changes to Cargo.lock can be introduced when switching branches and rebasing PRs.

If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged.
Otherwise, you can ignore this comment.

[jieyouxu]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit 9f469eb with merge bc87f15...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: bc87f15 (bc87f15517ca0035d40259056ab10278dd3bd5d3)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (bc87f15): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.2%	[-0.4%, -0.2%]	26
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.2%	[-0.4%, -0.2%]	26

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary -0.4%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	6.3%	[6.3%, 6.3%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.8%	[-3.9%, -3.7%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

Results (primary -2.7%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.7%	[-2.7%, -2.7%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.7%	[-2.7%, -2.7%]	1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 778.541s -> 779.108s (0.07%)
Artifact size: 328.82 MiB -> 328.82 MiB (0.00%)