Skip to content

syntax: Fix regression in diagnostics for patterns in trait method parameters #57251

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 2, 2019

Conversation

petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #55036

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @eddyb

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 1, 2019
@varkor
Copy link
Member

varkor commented Jan 1, 2019

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 1, 2019

📌 Commit 3df500d has been approved by varkor

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 1, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 2, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 3df500d with merge d370493...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2019
syntax: Fix regression in diagnostics for patterns in trait method parameters

Fixes #55036
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 2, 2019

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: varkor
Pushing d370493 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 3df500d into rust-lang:master Jan 2, 2019
@petrochenkov petrochenkov deleted the reregr branch June 5, 2019 16:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants