Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency abseil-cpp to v20250814.2#115

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
renovate/abseil-cpp-20250814.x
Open

chore(deps): update dependency abseil-cpp to v20250814.2#115
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
renovate/abseil-cpp-20250814.x

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 22, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
abseil-cpp bazel_dep minor 20250814.020250814.2

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Release Notes

abseil/abseil-cpp (abseil-cpp)

v20250814.2: Abseil LTS branch, August 2025, Patch 2

Compare Source

Abseil LTS 2025081.2

What's New:

  • absl::Mutex now contains lower-case method names like lock() and shared_lock() to align with standard C++ mutex methods. This allows absl::Mutex to be used with std::scoped_lock and friends. The old names are still present but may be removed in a future release.
  • The RAII Mutex-locker types like absl::MutexLock, absl::ReaderMutexLock, and friends now accept references to absl::Mutex. The pointer-accepting constructors are now deprecated, and may be removed in a future release.

Breaking Changes:

  • Nullability template types, which were deprecated in the May 2025 release, have been removed.
  • absl::string_view(nullptr), which is undefined behavior according to the C++ standard, now triggers an assert failure. Note that unless you changed absl/base/options.h, absl::string_view is an alias for std::string_view, so by default you will be inheriting the behavior of your standard library instead of using the Abseil implementation.
  • Abseil's hash tables now require a hash function that has a return type with size >= sizeof(size_t).

Baseline: 987c57f
Cherry-pick: d38452e (Patch 1)
Cherry-pick: 7313246 (Patch 2)

v20250814.1: Abseil LTS branch, August 2025, Patch 1

Compare Source

Abseil LTS 2025081.1

What's New:

  • absl::Mutex now contains lower-case method names like lock() and shared_lock() to align with standard C++ mutex methods. This allows absl::Mutex to be used with std::scoped_lock and friends. The old names are still present but may be removed in a future release.
  • The RAII Mutex-locker types like absl::MutexLock, absl::ReaderMutexLock, and friends now accept references to absl::Mutex. The pointer-accepting constructors are now deprecated, and may be removed in a future release.

Breaking Changes:

  • Nullability template types, which were deprecated in the May 2025 release, have been removed.
  • absl::string_view(nullptr), which is undefined behavior according to the C++ standard, now triggers an assert failure. Note that unless you changed absl/base/options.h, absl::string_view is an alias for std::string_view, so by default you will be inheriting the behavior of your standard library instead of using the Abseil implementation.
  • Abseil's hash tables now require a hash function that has a return type with size >= sizeof(size_t).

Baseline: 987c57f
Cherry-pick: d38452e (Patch 1)


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge September 22, 2025 21:58
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/abseil-cpp-20250814.x branch from 35cb274 to 595248f Compare February 11, 2026 20:30
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency abseil-cpp to v20250814.1 chore(deps): update dependency abseil-cpp to v20250814.2 Feb 11, 2026
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/abseil-cpp-20250814.x branch from 595248f to 0e93f9d Compare February 16, 2026 20:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants