-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[MISC] Allow recursive subcommands #233
Conversation
What does this do to the CWL export? |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #233 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 95.10% 95.12% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 18 18
Lines 1735 1742 +7
==========================================
+ Hits 1650 1657 +7
Misses 85 85 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
CTD looks ok, CWL has a duplicate base command? Click to open
|
0aed6de
to
9e3821e
Compare
9e3821e
to
fc26a68
Compare
fc26a68
to
8a33945
Compare
3c18364
to
fc4c414
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd like to see a test to confirm sane CWL output
e9b5684
to
37f9117
Compare
This'll need
|
37f9117
to
1f64772
Compare
Documentation preview available at https://docs.seqan.de/preview/seqan/sharg-parser/233 |
1f64772
to
2d1779b
Compare
2d1779b
to
ef1d6f5
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice! Looks good to me!
After
I kinda forgot about this one :)