Don't add oauth certs when migrating db

[myieye]

Migrating failed with:

Hosting failed to start
      System.Security.Cryptography.CryptographicException: The X509 certificate could not be added to the store.
       ---> System.UnauthorizedAccessException: Access to the path '/var/www' is denied.

let's see if this works...

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Upgraded the authentication integration by replacing the legacy seeding approach with a more streamlined service configuration, ensuring a solid foundation for OAuth application handling.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The change updates the migration process in the backend by replacing the old AuthKernel.AddOpenId call with a new OpenIddict configuration inside the RunMigrationRequest method. The seeding process for OAuth applications is now integrated into the service configuration using Entity Framework Core with LexBoxDbContext, effectively modernizing the approach.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
backend/LexBoxApi/MigrationKernel.cs	Removed AuthKernel.AddOpenId; integrated OpenIddict configuration via builder.Services.AddOpenIddict() to seed OAuth applications using EF Core with LexBoxDbContext.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant M as MigrationKernel
    participant S as ServiceCollection
    participant O as OpenIddict
    participant E as EF Core (LexBoxDbContext)

    U->>M: Invoke RunMigrationRequest
    M->>S: Call AddOpenIddict() configuration
    S->>O: Setup OpenIddict services
    O->>E: Configure to use LexBoxDbContext
    E-->>O: DB setup confirmation
    O-->>S: Service ready
    S-->>M: Return configured services

Loading

Poem

I'm a bunny with a joyful hop,
Coding changes make my circuits pop!
OpenIddict now takes the lead,
EF Core sows the seeding seed,
Leaping through migrations with a happy bop!

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dc74e5d and c9b48d4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• backend/LexBoxApi/MigrationKernel.cs (1 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• backend/LexBoxApi/MigrationKernel.cs

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (7)

• GitHub Check: Build hgweb / publish-hgweb
• GitHub Check: Build API / publish-api
• GitHub Check: Build FwHeadless / publish-fw-headless
• GitHub Check: Build UI / publish-ui
• GitHub Check: Build API / publish-api
• GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
• GitHub Check: Analyze (csharp)

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

UI unit Tests

12 tests  ±0   12 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
 4 suites ±0    0 💤 ±0 
 1 files   ±0    0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit c9b48d4. ± Comparison against base commit 23d7bc2.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

C# Unit Tests

107 tests  ±0   107 ✅ ±0   5s ⏱️ ±0s
 16 suites ±0     0 💤 ±0 
  1 files   ±0     0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit c9b48d4. ± Comparison against base commit 23d7bc2.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.