Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Update] Added erc20penaltyfee and erc721nolockup scenarios #38

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 24, 2024

Conversation

SergeyPoslavskiy
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 80.00000% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Please upload report for BASE (feature/code_refactor@9c283a6). Learn more about missing BASE report.
Report is 1 commits behind head on feature/code_refactor.

Files Patch % Lines
contracts/pools/ERC721/ERC721PenaltyFeePool.sol 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
contracts/mocks/ERC20MockToken.sol 66.66% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@                   Coverage Diff                    @@
##             feature/code_refactor      #38   +/-   ##
========================================================
  Coverage                         ?   62.50%           
========================================================
  Files                            ?       10           
  Lines                            ?      600           
  Branches                         ?      157           
========================================================
  Hits                             ?      375           
  Misses                           ?      224           
  Partials                         ?        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@SergeyPoslavskiy SergeyPoslavskiy merged commit 7410a0f into feature/code_refactor Jun 24, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants