Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: inconsistent field names #42

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

eliecharra
Copy link
Member

  • Context.spec.space -> Context.spec.spaceName
  • Context.spec.attachments.stack -> Context.spec.attachments.stackName
  • Policy.spec.attachedStacks -> Policy.spec.attachedStacksNames

@eliecharra eliecharra requested a review from peterdeme June 18, 2024 08:39
@eliecharra eliecharra requested a review from a team as a code owner June 18, 2024 08:39
Base automatically changed from fix/make_spec_name_optional to main June 18, 2024 08:55
@eliecharra eliecharra force-pushed the fix/inconsistent_field_names branch from 9e54eb9 to 206ef0f Compare June 18, 2024 08:56
- `Context.spec.space` -> `Context.spec.spaceName`
- `Policy.spec.attachedStacks` -> `Policy.spec.attachedStacksNames`
- `Context.spec.attachments.stack` ->
`Context.spec.attachments.stackName`
@eliecharra eliecharra force-pushed the fix/inconsistent_field_names branch from 206ef0f to 9d61c2b Compare June 18, 2024 08:57
@eliecharra eliecharra changed the base branch from main to chore/add_more_repo_tests June 18, 2024 08:57
Base automatically changed from chore/add_more_repo_tests to main June 18, 2024 09:16
@eliecharra eliecharra merged commit f64ccc7 into main Jun 18, 2024
5 checks passed
@eliecharra eliecharra deleted the fix/inconsistent_field_names branch June 18, 2024 09:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants