Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Jupyterhub with keycloak, spark and s3 #155

Merged
merged 39 commits into from
Mar 4, 2025
Merged

Conversation

adwk67
Copy link
Member

@adwk67 adwk67 commented Feb 26, 2025

This demo illustrates JupyterHub usage with Keycloak. Various configuration settings will be explained in more detail in the main documentation. See stackabletech/documentation#715.

@adwk67 adwk67 linked an issue Feb 26, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@adwk67 adwk67 self-assigned this Feb 28, 2025
@adwk67 adwk67 marked this pull request as ready for review February 28, 2025 15:16
@adwk67 adwk67 changed the title feat: jupyterhub with keycloak, spark and s3 feat: Jupyterhub with keycloak, spark and s3 Feb 28, 2025
@adwk67 adwk67 requested a review from a team February 28, 2025 15:22
@maltesander maltesander self-requested a review March 3, 2025 11:32
Copy link
Member

@maltesander maltesander left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Worked smoothly, first batch of comments, will do some more testing!

Copy link
Member

@sbernauer sbernauer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the nice demo!
One general remark, what is the reason that HDFS was added? I feel like this over-complicates the demo a bit, S3 would be sufficient from my point of view.

Review comments.

Co-authored-by: Malte Sander <[email protected]>
@adwk67
Copy link
Member Author

adwk67 commented Mar 3, 2025

Thanks for the nice demo! One general remark, what is the reason that HDFS was added? I feel like this over-complicates the demo a bit, S3 would be sufficient from my point of view.

Yes, I think I agree - I'll take it out (we have it included in one of the other jupyterhub demos anyway).

@sbernauer
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

Copy link
Member

@sbernauer sbernauer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for addressing the feedback!

@adwk67
Copy link
Member Author

adwk67 commented Mar 3, 2025

Thanks!

Done: 80bd2c6

@adwk67 adwk67 requested a review from maltesander March 3, 2025 15:33
Copy link
Member

@maltesander maltesander left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! LGTM!

@adwk67 adwk67 added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 4, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 96c04ac Mar 4, 2025
2 checks passed
@adwk67 adwk67 deleted the feat/keycloak-jupyterhub branch March 4, 2025 09:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Development: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

SDP support for JupyterHub
3 participants