refactor: update math/base/special/rcbrt
#2189
Conversation
Signed-off-by: GUNJ JOSHI <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: GUNJ JOSHI <[email protected]>
| "libraries": [ | ||
| "-lm" | ||
| ], | ||
| "libraries": [], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is likely fine, as we explicitly specify -lm in the make recipes.
| y = rcbrt( x[i] ); | ||
| if ( y === expected[i] ) { | ||
| t.equal( y, expected[i], 'x: '+x[i]+', y: '+y+', expected: '+expected[i] ); | ||
| y = rcbrt( x[ i ] ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These changes are fine. Note, however, that, for the most part, we are not militant about this. By default, yes, we use spaces. But we also allow some flexibility depending on what aspects of the code should be visually emphasized. Can describe in more detail our "philosophy", if it can be called that, during a call. But regardless, I wouldn't go overboard with going out of your way to enforce spacing, so long as a file is consistent (e.g., nothing along the lines of [i ] or [ i], etc). Otherwise, you're likely to just create more work for yourself.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Okay. I understood this now. I was a bit doubtful about this, that in most of our packages, we do not have spaces here, which seems completely reasonable now.
Description
This pull request:
main.cinstead of earlierrcbrt.c.javascriptexamples.Related Issues
None.
Questions
No.
Other
Made changes according to what we did in
rcbrtf. Along with that, renamedrcbrt.ctomain.cto achieve standardization.Checklist
@stdlib-js/reviewers