Fix missing diagnostics about the lack of initializers in cross-module inheritance scenarios #70219
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When a class inherits a superclass from another module, and that superclass has non-public designated initializers, two important diagnostics were being suppressed:
required
initializers in the superclass that couldn't be synthesized in the subclass, andBetween the two, it became possible to create a class that could not be initialized statically (doing so would produce an error), but that could be dynamically created via the required initializer---without initializing the subclass's storage. Introduce diagnostics for both, staging them in via warnings in Swift 5 and becoming errors in Swift 6.
Fixes #69965