Skip to content

Conversation

@imalasong
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?
getBlockByNum() is useless in this place,He should completely hand it over to the producer getBlock() method

Why are these changes required?

This PR has been tested by:

  • Unit Tests
  • Manual Testing

Follow up

Extra details

@imalasong imalasong closed this Apr 13, 2025
@imalasong imalasong reopened this Apr 13, 2025
@imalasong
Copy link
Contributor Author

I thought about it later, and if the exception is caused by the block itself, it seems necessary to retrieve it again. Whether to reacquire it or not, official personnel can discuss it

@CodeNinjaEvan
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your submission! After evaluating it, we have decided to leave it as is in order to deal with the anomaly. We sincerely appreciate your contribution!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants