Skip to content

Conversation

@CristhianDaza
Copy link
Contributor

General

✏️ Mark the necessary items without changing the structure of the PR template.

  • Pull request template structure not broken

Type

ℹ️ What types of changes does your code introduce?

👉 Put an x in the boxes that apply

  • Fix
  • Feature

Checklist

ℹ️ Check all checkboxes - this will indicate that you have done everything in accordance with the rules in CONTRIBUTING.

👉 Put an x in the boxes that apply.

  • Title as described
  • Make sure you put things in the right category!
  • Always add your items to the end of a list

Open Source

  • Link description does not contain a link to an author / third-party resource
  • The documentation (README) contains a description of the project, illustration of the project with a demo or screenshots and a CONTRIBUTING section
  • The documentation is in English.
  • The project is active and maintained.
  • The project accepts contributions.
  • Not a commercial product

Apps/Websites

  • The website is available without errors or ssl certificate problems, and load in a reasonable amount of time.
  • The website is using vuejs intensively. It should detect vue with vue-devtools.

    If you cannot detect vue with vue-devtools due to work at non public pages (e.g. for enterprise website), you can send Pull Request with screenshot that detected it.

  • The website is original and not too simple. For that reason, blogs and simple landing pages are rejected.
  • A commercial product using Vue, provided that guests could reasonably check out how Vue was used (i.e. A headless CMS which uses Vue for the Admin/editor Area and offers a free tier).

@Jogai
Copy link
Collaborator

Jogai commented Jan 27, 2026

Since its all from the same framework, a single link will be enough

@CristhianDaza
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Jogai I understand the concern about list space. However, I listed them individually because each one is an independent package with its own versioning on npm and its own dedicated documentation/demo.

They aren't just parts of a single library, but a collection of standalone tools. That said, I want to follow the project's guidelines: if you still prefer a single entry pointing to the main organization or monorepo after considering their independence, let me know and I’ll consolidate them into one.

@Jogai
Copy link
Collaborator

Jogai commented Jan 27, 2026

While not an explicit rule, I prefer to have a single link for the whole monorepo. Feel free to add your blog. Also remove the toc part, I just automated that part.

@CristhianDaza
Copy link
Contributor Author

Perfect, I understand. I will update this PR to include only the blog and remove the TOC part as requested.

Once I have the main package that encompasses all the components ready, I’ll create a new PR for it. Thanks for the feedback and for automating the TOC!

@Jogai Jogai merged commit e0200e4 into vuejs:master Jan 27, 2026
1 check passed
@Jogai
Copy link
Collaborator

Jogai commented Jan 27, 2026

Thank you too, now I could confirm that the toc-generator works as intended.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants