Skip to content

Proof of creditworthiness short use case per issue #137 #156

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions index.html
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -427,6 +427,8 @@ <h3>Finance</h3>
data-include-replace="true" data-format="html"></div>
<div data-include="short/f5_new_bank_account_from_home.html"
data-include-replace="true" data-format="html"></div>
<div data-include="short/f6_proof_of_creditworthiness.html"
data-include-replace="true" data-format="html"></div>
</dl>
</section>

Expand Down
8 changes: 8 additions & 0 deletions short/f6_proof_of_creditworthiness.html
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
<dt>
<udef>F.6 Proof of creditworthiness</udef>
</dt>
<dd>
<p>Alice has checking and saving accounts, loans, and credit cards at multiple banks. Due to local regulatory restrictions, the banks may not exchange information about the subjects to whom they issue credit cards.</p>

<p>To prove her creditworthiness when applying for a mortgage, Alice acquires verifiable credentials issued by each bank containing type and balance for each account. She creates a verifiable presentation aggregating all accounts (type and balance) without revealing any issuers of the underlying data.</p>
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The phrase underlying data reads to me as if the VP is doing a selective disclosure over the data in the VCs, but I don't believe we have a mechanism for that.

Suggested change
<p>To prove her creditworthiness when applying for a mortgage, Alice acquires verifiable credentials issued by each bank containing type and balance for each account. She creates a verifiable presentation aggregating all accounts (type and balance) without revealing any issuers of the underlying data.</p>
<p>To prove her creditworthiness when applying for a mortgage, Alice acquires verifiable credentials issued by each bank containing type and balance for each account. She creates a verifiable presentation aggregating all accounts (type and balance) without revealing any issuers of the underlying data.</p>

What we could do is pass the balance and bank info on, while avoiding the legacy approach of providing bank statements with all the account transactions.

Or maybe something with zksnarks to add a custom predicate to the VP, but I haven't seen anyone work through those details.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Per our conversation today, let's look at a set of selectively disclosable verifiable credentials which comprise a 3 year history of bank activity (one statement per months). Using predicate proofs, our hero is able to demonstrate that in each and every month they maintained a balance of at least $50,000 USD, without revealing the actual balance values nor the actual transactions.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok. Let's move this forward. I'm going to take on the assignment and base this on 9 annual statements, each a VC with BBS securing algorithm, and zkSnarks for predicate analysis. We'll derive 9 proofs (one from each year), which include the year, the account owner identifier (as DID), and the average balance for that year. These 9 proofs will show that in each year, the funds available to the subject, on average, exceeded $50,000.

</dd>