-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
Proof of creditworthiness short use case per issue #137 #156
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
KDean-GS1
wants to merge
2
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
f6_proof_of_creditworthiness
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ | ||
<dt> | ||
<udef>F.6 Proof of creditworthiness</udef> | ||
</dt> | ||
<dd> | ||
<p>Alice has checking and saving accounts, loans, and credit cards at multiple banks. Due to local regulatory restrictions, the banks may not exchange information about the subjects to whom they issue credit cards.</p> | ||
|
||
<p>To prove her creditworthiness when applying for a mortgage, Alice acquires verifiable credentials issued by each bank containing type and balance for each account. She creates a verifiable presentation aggregating all accounts (type and balance) without revealing any issuers of the underlying data.</p> | ||
</dd> |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The phrase underlying data reads to me as if the VP is doing a selective disclosure over the data in the VCs, but I don't believe we have a mechanism for that.
What we could do is pass the balance and bank info on, while avoiding the legacy approach of providing bank statements with all the account transactions.
Or maybe something with zksnarks to add a custom predicate to the VP, but I haven't seen anyone work through those details.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Per our conversation today, let's look at a set of selectively disclosable verifiable credentials which comprise a 3 year history of bank activity (one statement per months). Using predicate proofs, our hero is able to demonstrate that in each and every month they maintained a balance of at least $50,000 USD, without revealing the actual balance values nor the actual transactions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok. Let's move this forward. I'm going to take on the assignment and base this on 9 annual statements, each a VC with BBS securing algorithm, and zkSnarks for predicate analysis. We'll derive 9 proofs (one from each year), which include the year, the account owner identifier (as DID), and the average balance for that year. These 9 proofs will show that in each year, the funds available to the subject, on average, exceeded $50,000.