fix: wipe conversation after member leave event [WPB-16204] 🍒

[github-actions]

WPB-16204 [Android] First message missing after leaving and being added to MLS group

This PR was automatically cherry-picked based on the following PR:

• fix: wipe conversation after member leave event [WPB-16204] #3301

Original PR description:

---

---

PR Submission Checklist for internal contributors

• The PR Title

  • conforms to the style of semantic commits messages¹ supported in Wire's Github Workflow²
  • contains a reference JIRA issue number like SQPIT-764
  • answers the question: If merged, this PR will: ... ³

• The PR Description

  • is free of optional paragraphs and you have filled the relevant parts to the best of your ability

---

What's new in this PR?

Issues

When the user is logged in to two clients, web and android, is added to a conversation, then leaves from web and then is added again then:

• when web client sends first message android client will not receive this message and will show recovery system message

Causes (Optional)

First message after rejoining to conversation is not visible to other client

Solutions

• wipe mls conversation if Member remove event contains self user
• fixed issue for triggering requesting twice to remove self user from conversation

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[github-actions]

Test Results

3 522 tests  +2   3 414 ✅ +2   5m 58s ⏱️ -31s
  603 suites ±0     108 💤 ±0 
  603 files   ±0       0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit ceaff59. ± Comparison against base commit 7c462ea.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Bencher Report

Branch	fix/wipe-conversation-after-client-left-cherry-pick
Testbed	ubuntu-latest

⚠️ WARNING: No Threshold found!

Without a Threshold, no Alerts will ever be generated.

• Latency (nanoseconds (ns))

Click here to create a new Threshold
For more information, see the Threshold documentation.
To only post results if a Threshold exists, set the --ci-only-thresholds flag.

Click to view all benchmark results

Benchmark	Latency	microseconds (µs)
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.logic.CoreLogicBenchmark.createObjectInFiles	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	692.58
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.logic.CoreLogicBenchmark.createObjectInMemory	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	601,227.63
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessagesNoPragmaTuneBenchmark.messageInsertionBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	1,344,468.61
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessagesNoPragmaTuneBenchmark.queryMessagesBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	26,718.76

🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 50.69%. Comparing base (7c462ea) to head (ceaff59).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #3302   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    50.68%   50.69%           
========================================
  Files         1611     1611           
  Lines        58145    58163   +18     
  Branches      5246     5249    +3     
========================================
+ Hits         29473    29487   +14     
- Misses       26645    26648    +3     
- Partials      2027     2028    +1     

see 4 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7c462ea...ceaff59. Read the comment docs.

[datadog-wireapp]

Datadog Report

Branch report: fix/wipe-conversation-after-client-left-cherry-pick
Commit report: 27a1ccc
Test service: kalium-jvm

✅ 0 Failed, 3414 Passed, 108 Skipped, 1m 0.97s Total Time