fix(deps): bump actions/labeler from 3 to 4.0.1

[dependabot]

Bumps actions/labeler from 3 to 4.0.1.

Release notes

Sourced from actions/labeler's releases.

v4.0.1

• Update @actions/core dependency to v1.9.1 to pull in recent security fixes

v4.0.0

• Update to node 16 runtime

v3.1.0

Dependency upgrades, docs updates, and behind-the-scenes maintenance.

See the full list of changes since 3.0.2 here: actions/labeler@v3.0.2...v3.1.0

Thanks to @​GisoBartels and @​Muhammed-Rahif for their contributions!

v3.0.2

No API changes, but lots of behind-the-scenes upgrades, mostly to internal dependencies, tooling, and surrounding infrastructure.

v3.0.1

No user-facing changes.

That said, there were more than enough behind-the-scenes changes to warrant a new release: actions/labeler@v3.0.0...v3.0.1

Commits

• e54e5b3 4.0.1 (#422)
• fd87190 Bump package.json version to 4.0.0 (#419)
• c959bdd Merge pull request #417 from cory-miller/main
• 493ae8a re-build package
• 1550814 fix license type for other version of actions/http-client
• a29491a fix license type for actions/http-client
• 6e5bdb7 Updates licenses
• 3d918dd Bump @​actions/core
• 74e99cd Merge pull request #376 from actions/dependabot/npm_and_yarn/vercel/ncc-0.34.0
• d81b399 Bump @​vercel/ncc from 0.33.3 to 0.34.0
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
• @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
• @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

[dependabot]

Dependabot tried to add @GregoireF and @NicolasV as reviewers to this PR, but received the following error from GitHub:

POST https://api.github.com/repos/wr-projects/cz-changelog-wrprojects/pulls/147/requested_reviewers: 422 - Reviews may only be requested from collaborators. One or more of the users or teams you specified is not a collaborator of the wr-projects/cz-changelog-wrprojects repository. // See: https://docs.github.com/rest/reference/pulls#request-reviewers-for-a-pull-request

[pull-request-quantifier-deprecated]

This PR has 2 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

---

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Small
Size       : +1 -1
Percentile : 0.8%

Total files changed: 1

Change summary by file extension:
.yml : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

• Fast and predictable releases to production:
  • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
    iterations.
  • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
• Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
  • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
  • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
• Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
  • Small portions can be assimilated better.
• Better engineering practices are exercised:
  • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
  • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

• Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
  • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
  • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
• Change your engineering behaviors
  • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
    • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
    • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

• One line was added: +1 -0
• One line was deleted: +0 -1
• One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
  interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
• Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
  of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

---

Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}