Built site for gh-pages

.nojekyll

@@ -1 +1 @@
-b5089ff3
+b3355f65

CITF-Postdoc.bib

@@ -17702,6 +17702,19 @@ @inbook{flick2000
   file = {/Users/zackbatist/Library/CloudStorage/Dropbox/zotero/Flick 2000 - Episodic Interviewing.pdf}
 }
 
+@book{flick2018,
+  title = {The {{Sage Handbook}} of {{Qualitative Data Collection}}},
+  editor = {Flick, Uwe},
+  date = {2018},
+  publisher = {Sage Reference},
+  location = {Los Angeles},
+  abstract = {Qualitative research has now established itself beyond the original disciplines like sociology, anthropology and education in fields such as nursing, medicine, social work, psychology, information science and political sciences. As qualitative research has expanded, so have the number of different methods and approaches for data collection. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection provides an overview of the methodological developments available to social science researchers},
+  isbn = {978-1-4739-5213-3},
+  pagetotal = {708},
+  annotation = {OCLC: on1010566433},
+  file = {/Users/zackbatist/Library/CloudStorage/Dropbox/zotero/Flick   2018 - The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection.pdf}
+}
+
 @article{flinn2019,
   title = {Rogue Archives: Digital Cultural Memory and Media Fandom},
   shorttitle = {Rogue Archives},
@@ -29694,7 +29707,7 @@ @article{kelle2005
   urldate = {2022-09-08},
   abstract = {Since the late 1960s Barney GLASER and Anselm STRAUSS, developers of the methodology of "Grounded Theory" have made several attempts to explicate, clarify and reconceptualise some of the basic tenets of their methodological approach. Diverging concepts and understandings of Grounded Theory have arisen from these attempts which have led to a split between its founders. Much of the explication and reworking of Grounded Theory surrounds the relation between data and theory and the role of previous theoretical assumptions. The book which initially established the popularity of GLASER's and STRAUSS' methodological ideas, "The Discovery of Grounded Theory", contains two conflicting understandings of the relation between data and theory—the concept of "emergence" on the one hand and the concept of "theoretical sensitivity" on the other hand. Much of the later developments of Grounded Theory can be seen as attempts to reconcile these prima facie diverging concepts. Thereby GLASER recommends to draw on a variety of "coding families" while STRAUSS proposes the use of a general theory of action to build an axis for an emerging theory. This paper first summarises the most important developments within "Grounded Theory" concerning the understanding of the relation between empirical data and theoretical statements. Thereby special emphasis will be laid on differences between GLASER's and STRAUSS' concepts and on GLASER's current critique that the concepts of "coding paradigm" and "axial coding" described by STRAUSS and Juliet CORBIN lead to the "forcing" of data. It will be argued that GLASER's critique points out some existing weaknesses of STRAUSS' concepts but vastly exaggerates the risks of the STRAUSSian approach. A main argument of this paper is that basic problems of empirically grounded theory construction can be treated much more effectively if one draws on certain results of contemporary philosophical and epistemological discussions and on widely accepted concepts developed in such debates. This especially refers to the critique of naive empiricism, to the concept of hypothetical or abductive inference, to the concept of empirical content or falsifiability of statements and to the concept of corroboration. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0502275},
   langid = {english},
-  file = {/Users/zackbatist/Zotero/storage/L7TSBYWH/Kelle   2005 - Emergence vs. Forcing of Empirical Data A Crucial Problem of Grounded Theory Reconsidered.pdf}
+  file = {/Users/zackbatist/Library/CloudStorage/Dropbox/zotero/Kelle   2005 - Emergence vs. Forcing of Empirical Data A Crucial Problem of Grounded Theory Reconsidered.pdf}
 }
 
 @inproceedings{keller1990,
@@ -30760,6 +30773,24 @@ @book{kitzes2017
   file = {/Users/zackbatist/Library/CloudStorage/Dropbox/zotero/Kitzes et al 2017 - The Practice of Reproducible Research.pdf}
 }
 
+@article{kitzinger1994,
+  title = {The Methodology of {{Focus Groups}}: The Importance of Interaction between Research Participants},
+  shorttitle = {The Methodology of {{Focus Groups}}},
+  author = {Kitzinger, Jenny},
+  date = {1994},
+  journaltitle = {Sociology of Health \& Illness},
+  volume = {16},
+  number = {1},
+  pages = {103--121},
+  issn = {1467-9566},
+  doi = {10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023},
+  url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023},
+  urldate = {2025-02-17},
+  abstract = {What are focus groups? How are they distinct from ordinary group discussions and what use are they anyway? This article introduces focus group methodology, explores ways of conducting such groups and examines what this technique of data collection can offer researchers in general and medical sociologists in particular. It concentrates on the one feature which inevitably distinguishes focus groups from one-to-one interviews or questionnaires – namely the interaction between research participants - and argues for the overt exploration and exploitation of such interaction in the research process.},
+  langid = {english},
+  file = {/Users/zackbatist/Library/CloudStorage/Dropbox/zotero/Kitzinger   1994 - The methodology of Focus Groups the importance of interaction between research participants.pdf}
+}
+
 @article{kivela2014,
   title = {Multilayer Networks},
   author = {Kivelä, Mikko and Arenas, Alex and Barthelemy, Marc and Gleeson, James P. and Moreno, Yamir and Porter, Mason A.},
@@ -37838,6 +37869,22 @@ @article{morgan2018a
   file = {/Users/zackbatist/Library/CloudStorage/Dropbox/zotero/Morgan 2018 - The consequences of framing digital humanities tools as easy to use.pdf}
 }
 
+@inbook{morgan2018b,
+  title = {Focus {{Groups}}},
+  booktitle = {The {{SAGE Handbook}} of {{Qualitative Data Collection}}},
+  author = {Morgan, David L. and Hoffman, Kim},
+  date = {2018},
+  pages = {250--263},
+  publisher = {SAGE Publications Ltd},
+  location = {1 Oliver's Yard,~55 City Road~London~EC1Y 1SP},
+  doi = {10.4135/9781526416070.n16},
+  url = {https://sk.sagepub.com/reference/the-sage-handbook-of-qualitative-data-collection/i1877.xml},
+  urldate = {2025-02-17},
+  bookauthor = {Flick, Uwe},
+  isbn = {978-1-4739-5213-3 978-1-5264-1607-0},
+  file = {/Users/zackbatist/Library/CloudStorage/Dropbox/zotero/Morgan and Hoffman   2018 - Focus Groups.pdf}
+}
+
 @article{morgan2019,
   ids = {morganAvatarsMonstersMachines2019,morganAvatarsMonstersMachinesundefined/ed},
   title = {Avatars, {{Monsters}}, and {{Machines}}: {{A Cyborg Archaeology}}},
@@ -40848,6 +40895,24 @@ @article{park2021
   file = {/Users/zackbatist/Library/CloudStorage/Dropbox/zotero/Park 2021 - An Actor-Network Perspective on Collections Documentation and Data Practices at Museums.pdf}
 }
 
+@article{parker2006,
+  title = {Focus Group Method and Methodology: Current Practice and Recent Debate},
+  shorttitle = {Focus Group Method and Methodology},
+  author = {Parker, Andrew and Tritter, Jonathan},
+  date = {2006-04-01},
+  journaltitle = {International Journal of Research \& Method in Education},
+  volume = {29},
+  number = {1},
+  pages = {23--37},
+  publisher = {Routledge},
+  issn = {1743-727X},
+  doi = {10.1080/01406720500537304},
+  url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/01406720500537304},
+  urldate = {2025-02-17},
+  abstract = {This paper considers the contemporary use of focus groups as a method of data collection within qualitative research settings. The authors draw upon their own experiences of using focus groups in educational and ‘community’ user‐group environments in order to provide an overview of recent issues and debates surrounding the deployment of focus group methods and to pick out specific areas of contention in relation to both their epistemological and practical implications. Accordingly, the paper reflects on some of the realities of ‘doing’ focus groups whilst, at the same time, highlighting common problems and dilemmas which beginning researchers might encounter in their application. In turn, the paper raises a number of related issues around which there appears to have been a lack of academic discussion to date.},
+  file = {/Users/zackbatist/Library/CloudStorage/Dropbox/zotero/Parker and Tritter   2006 - Focus group method and methodology current practice and recent debate.pdf}
+}
+
 @article{parker2014,
   title = {Archaeology in the {{Third}} and {{Fourth Dimensions}}: {{A Case Study}} of {{3D Data Collection}} and {{Analysis From Prince Rupert}}, {{BC}}, {{Canada}}},
   author = {Parker, A. and Eldridge, M.},
@@ -54555,6 +54620,24 @@ @article{wickler2016
   file = {/Users/zackbatist/Library/CloudStorage/Dropbox/zotero/Wickler 2016 - The Centrality of Small Islands in Arctic Norway From the Viking Age to Recent Historic Period.pdf}
 }
 
+@article{wilkinson1998,
+  title = {Focus Group Methodology: A Review},
+  shorttitle = {Focus Group Methodology},
+  author = {Wilkinson, Sue},
+  date = {1998-01-01},
+  journaltitle = {International Journal of Social Research Methodology},
+  volume = {1},
+  number = {3},
+  pages = {181--203},
+  publisher = {Routledge},
+  issn = {1364-5579},
+  doi = {10.1080/13645579.1998.10846874},
+  url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.1998.10846874},
+  urldate = {2025-02-17},
+  abstract = {This paper introduces and reviews the use of focus group methodology across the social sciences, identifying three different research traditions within which it has been used. It examines some key considerations affecting the use of focus groups, and highlights three central features of focus group research: providing access to participants' own language, concepts and concerns; encouraging the production of more fully articulated accounts; and offering an opportunity to observe the process of collective sense-making in action. Finally, the paper outlines some of the issues in the analysis of focus group data-an area with considerable potential for future development.},
+  file = {/Users/zackbatist/Library/CloudStorage/Dropbox/zotero/Wilkinson   1998 - Focus group methodology a review.pdf}
+}
+
 @article{wilkinson2019,
   title = {Towards an {{Archaeological Theory}} of {{Infrastructure}}},
   author = {Wilkinson, Darryl},

notes.html

@@ -307,9 +307,9 @@ <h1 class="title">Notes</h1>
 <span class="listing-categories">cases, brainstorming</span>
 </td>
 </tr>
-<tr data-index="1" data-categories="cmVhZGluZyUyQ2dlbmVyYWwlMjB0aG91Z2h0cw==" data-listing-date-sort="1736744400000" data-listing-file-modified-sort="1739562423624" data-listing-date-modified-sort="1739562423000" data-listing-reading-time-sort="46" data-listing-word-count-sort="9166" data-listing-title-sort="Methodology notes" data-listing-filename-sort="methodology-notes.qmd">
+<tr data-index="1" data-categories="cmVhZGluZyUyQ2dlbmVyYWwlMjB0aG91Z2h0cw==" data-listing-date-sort="1736744400000" data-listing-file-modified-sort="1739828241395" data-listing-date-modified-sort="1739828241000" data-listing-reading-time-sort="58" data-listing-word-count-sort="11431" data-listing-title-sort="Methodology notes" data-listing-filename-sort="methodology-notes.qmd">
 <td>
-<span class="listing-date-modified">Feb 14, 2025</span>
+<span class="listing-date-modified">Feb 17, 2025</span>
 </td>
 <td>
 <a href="./notes/methodology-notes.html" class="title listing-title">Methodology notes</a>