Improve JavaScript runnable detection followup #21363
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…irst arg as string
```js
test("normal test", () => {
expect(true).toBe(true);
});
test.skip("skip test", () => {
expect(true).toBe(true);
});
test.only.failing("only failing test", () => {
expect(true).toBe(true);
});
// it was matching this as runnable, which is not correct
this.b("should not be a runnable", () => {
expect(true).toBe(true);
});
```
cla-bot
bot
added
the
cla-signed
RemcoSmitsDev
changed the title
|
Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Followup: #21246
Before
After
We did not need to add the
*as it was already matching one of them, we actually need at least one of them, so making it optional was a mistake.Don't think we need to add release notes, as the change is only on main the branch now.
Release Notes: