fix: correct spelling in test files and comments

[HusseinAdeiza]

Description

Fixed spelling errors in test files and comments.

⚠️ Note: Comment and test changes only. No functional code modified.

Changes

• Fix 'wont' → 'won't'
• Fix 'doesnt' → 'doesn't'

Files Modified

• packages/helpers/tests/dkim.test.ts
• packages/helpers/src/binary-format.ts
• packages/circuits/tests/email-verifier-no-body.test.ts

Impact

• Test comment clarity improvement only
• No functional changes to ZK email verification logic

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Corrected and clarified code comments across test files and helper utilities for improved code documentation clarity.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 066440b9-5600-4b7c-bef6-ec2208532ea0

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9f01979 and 4ea0326.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• packages/circuits/tests/email-verifier-no-body.test.ts
• packages/helpers/src/binary-format.ts
• packages/helpers/tests/dkim.test.ts

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR updates three comment strings across test and helper files to improve code clarity. Test comments clarify DKIM field behavior and domain signature expectations; a helper function comment highlights potential encoding mismatch concerns during proof validation.

Changes

Documentation Clarifications

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Comment clarifications in tests and helpers packages/circuits/tests/email-verifier-no-body.test.ts, packages/helpers/src/binary-format.ts, packages/helpers/tests/dkim.test.ts	Test comments corrected for grammar and updated to explicitly state absent DKIM fields and expected domain signature failures; binary-format helper comment improved to call out potential encoding mismatch during proof validation.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Suggested reviewers

• saleel
• rutefig

Poem

🐰 Three little comments, polished and bright,
Grammar and clarity now set right.
DKIM fields noted, encoding concerns raised,
Code clarity blooms, and reviewers are phased! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately summarizes the main change: correcting spelling errors in test files and comments. It is concise and specific.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description covers the main changes and clarifies that only comments/tests were modified with no functional code changes, but lacks the template structure with Type of Change and Checklist sections.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 ESLint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

ESLint skipped: no ESLint configuration detected in root package.json. To enable, add eslint to devDependencies.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}