Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Custom folder sorting can be parametrized easily for any folder role #2240

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 11, 2025

Conversation

LunarX
Copy link
Contributor

@LunarX LunarX commented Mar 10, 2025

The snooze folder needs a new order for its threads, I took this opportunity to centralize and make it easily parametrisable.

For the snooze folder, not only did I need to change the order from the default descending order to an ascending order, but I also needed to sort by another property of the Thread model.

The goal is to have the Threads that will first be unsnoozed at the top of the screen

Depends on #2239

@LunarX LunarX added the enhancement Improve or expand upon an existing feature label Mar 10, 2025
@LunarX LunarX requested a review from KevinBoulongne March 10, 2025 15:46
@LunarX LunarX self-assigned this Mar 10, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the dependent This MR depends on another PR label Mar 10, 2025
@KevinBoulongne KevinBoulongne force-pushed the snooze-message-ordering branch from c55fda9 to a99e7ff Compare March 10, 2025 16:23
Base automatically changed from internal-date to snooze-feature-branch March 11, 2025 08:54
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the dependent This MR depends on another PR label Mar 11, 2025
Copy link

This PR/issue depends on:

@LunarX LunarX merged commit 6d30941 into snooze-feature-branch Mar 11, 2025
8 checks passed
@LunarX LunarX deleted the snooze-message-ordering branch March 11, 2025 08:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Improve or expand upon an existing feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants