feat: Rework domain-manager standard #879
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
gtema
force-pushed
the
domain-manager
branch
2 times, most recently
from
a24e311 to
9bbfeb1
Compare
Life shows that not all CSPs are capable to adopt the domain manager requirement due to certain architecture decisions or security requirement. Suggest a rework that splits requirements into mandatory and recommended. Signed-off-by: Artem Goncharov <[email protected]>
gtema
force-pushed
the
domain-manager
branch
from
9bbfeb1 to
1f6cf85
Compare
fkr
reviewed
Feb 11, 2025
fkr
reviewed
Feb 11, 2025
fkr
reviewed
Feb 11, 2025
fkr
reviewed
Feb 11, 2025
fkr
reviewed
Feb 11, 2025
fkr
reviewed
Feb 11, 2025
fkr
reviewed
Feb 11, 2025
fkr
reviewed
Feb 11, 2025
Co-authored-by: Felix Kronlage-Dammers <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Artem Goncharov <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Felix Kronlage-Dammers <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Artem Goncharov <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Felix Kronlage-Dammers <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Artem Goncharov <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Felix Kronlage-Dammers <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Artem Goncharov <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Felix Kronlage-Dammers <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Artem Goncharov <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Felix Kronlage-Dammers <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Artem Goncharov <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Felix Kronlage-Dammers <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Artem Goncharov <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Felix Kronlage-Dammers <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Artem Goncharov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Artem Goncharov <[email protected]>
berendt
reviewed
Feb 12, 2025
|
|
||
| Another important requirement was to provide self-service capability for | ||
| customers to create projects as desired without requesting CSP support. This | ||
| capability MUST be available using native cloud APIs. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This will lead to problems and effort for providers who have external processes on projects or use external processes to create/manage projects.
berendt
reviewed
Feb 12, 2025
| requesting CSP support. This capability provides possibility to temporarily | ||
| disable users to authorize into certain project by modifying `enabled` property | ||
| of the project. Further control of the project name, description, options and | ||
| tags MUST be provided to the customer using native Keystone API. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Life shows that not all CSPs are capable to adopt the domain manager
requirement due to certain architecture decisions or security requirement.
Suggest a rework that splits requirements into mandatory and recommended.
Signed-off-by: Artem Goncharov [email protected]