Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

resolving a runtime with access token verification #4287

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 26, 2025

Conversation

Baalmart
Copy link
Contributor

@Baalmart Baalmart commented Jan 26, 2025

  • resolving a runtime with access token verification

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling in token verification process
    • Enhanced logging for potential errors during token updates
  • Refactor

    • Updated last_ip_address field type from Date to String in access token model

The changes focus on improving error tracking and data storage for access tokens, ensuring more robust authentication processes.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 26, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the authentication service's token management. Specifically, the changes involve updating the AccessTokenSchema to store the last_ip_address as a string instead of a date, and enhancing error handling in the token verification utility. These modifications aim to improve the robustness of IP address tracking and error logging mechanisms within the authentication system.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/auth-service/models/AccessToken.js Changed last_ip_address field type from Date to String
src/auth-service/utils/token.util.js Added try-catch blocks for error handling in token verification and API usage logging

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🔐 Tokens dance, IP addresses gleam,
Errors caught in a try-catch stream
Strings replace dates with gentle grace
Security's rhythm finds its pace
Code evolves, resilience takes flight! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6a808a5 and 8751753.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/auth-service/models/AccessToken.js (1 hunks)
  • src/auth-service/utils/token.util.js (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: build-push-deploy-auth-service
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/auth-service/models/AccessToken.js (1)

44-44: LGTM! Appropriate type correction for IP address storage.

The change from Date to String type for last_ip_address field is correct as IP addresses should be stored as strings, not dates.

src/auth-service/utils/token.util.js (2)

774-781: LGTM! Robust error handling for token updates.

The try-catch block ensures that token verification continues even if the update operation fails, while still logging the error for debugging.


793-797: LGTM! Proper error handling for API usage logging.

The try-catch block prevents logging failures from affecting the token verification process, maintaining system reliability while ensuring errors are captured.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 26, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 11.33%. Comparing base (6a808a5) to head (8751753).
Report is 2 commits behind head on staging.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           staging    #4287   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    11.33%   11.33%           
========================================
  Files          154      154           
  Lines        17882    17882           
  Branches       380      380           
========================================
  Hits          2027     2027           
  Misses       15853    15853           
  Partials         2        2           

Copy link
Contributor

Auth-service changes in this PR available for preview here

@Baalmart Baalmart merged commit ef33d6c into staging Jan 26, 2025
52 checks passed
@Baalmart Baalmart deleted the hf-token-verification branch January 26, 2025 22:51
@Baalmart Baalmart mentioned this pull request Jan 26, 2025
6 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant