Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix/issue 3913 #4436

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 8, 2024
Merged

Fix/issue 3913 #4436

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 8, 2024

Conversation

Devin-Crawford
Copy link
Contributor

Setting design_name to a valid design name in the project now sets that one to the active design.

- If the design_name is set to a name that is already in the design_list, then that becomes the current design.

- Update test_01_Design.py and improve coverage.
  - Remove some dependence on naming between unit tests.
- If the design_name is set to a name that is already in the design_list, then that becomes the current design.

- Update test_01_Design.py and improve coverage.
  - Remove some dependence on naming between unit tests.
@ansys-reviewer-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for opening a Pull Request. If you want to perform a review write a comment saying:

@ansys-reviewer-bot review

@github-actions github-actions bot added the bug Something isn't working label Mar 31, 2024
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 31, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 81.46%. Comparing base (90f0caa) to head (e207779).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4436      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.44%   81.46%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         109      109              
  Lines       53581    53583       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits        43638    43649      +11     
+ Misses       9943     9934       -9     

Copy link
Member

@Samuelopez-ansys Samuelopez-ansys left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. @maxcapodi78 Do we need the timeout? It is hardcoded, I understand the reason, but not sure if this is safe.

@Devin-Crawford Devin-Crawford merged commit 4594372 into main Apr 8, 2024
15 checks passed
@Devin-Crawford Devin-Crawford deleted the fix/issue_3913 branch April 8, 2024 07:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants