-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.2k
feat(actions): add DomainNameResolver for human-friendly domain names #14355
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
f0df4f2
f23bb31
015013b
ca8d450
bb64b5f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ | ||
# Copyright 2021 Acryl Data, Inc. | ||
# | ||
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); | ||
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. | ||
# You may obtain a copy of the License at | ||
# | ||
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
# | ||
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software | ||
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, | ||
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. | ||
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | ||
# limitations under the License. | ||
|
||
from unittest.mock import Mock | ||
|
||
from datahub.metadata.schema_classes import DomainPropertiesClass | ||
from datahub.utilities.urns.urn import Urn | ||
from datahub_actions.utils.name_resolver import ( | ||
DomainNameResolver, | ||
_name_resolver_registry, | ||
get_entity_name_from_urn, | ||
get_entity_qualifier_from_urn, | ||
) | ||
|
||
|
||
def test_domain_name_resolver_without_graph(): | ||
"""Test DomainNameResolver fallback behavior when DataHubGraph is None""" | ||
resolver = DomainNameResolver() | ||
domain_urn = Urn.from_string("urn:li:domain:marketing-domain") | ||
|
||
entity_name = resolver.get_entity_name(domain_urn, None) | ||
|
||
# Should fallback to the domain ID from the URN | ||
assert entity_name == "marketing-domain" | ||
|
||
|
||
def test_domain_name_resolver_with_graph_no_properties(): | ||
"""Test DomainNameResolver when DataHubGraph is available but no properties found""" | ||
resolver = DomainNameResolver() | ||
domain_urn = Urn.from_string("urn:li:domain:marketing-domain") | ||
|
||
# Mock DataHubGraph that returns None for domain properties | ||
mock_graph = Mock() | ||
mock_graph.get_aspect.return_value = None | ||
|
||
entity_name = resolver.get_entity_name(domain_urn, mock_graph) | ||
|
||
# Should call get_aspect with correct parameters | ||
mock_graph.get_aspect.assert_called_once_with( | ||
str(domain_urn), DomainPropertiesClass | ||
) | ||
|
||
# Should fallback to the domain ID from the URN | ||
assert entity_name == "marketing-domain" | ||
|
||
def test_domain_name_resolver_with_graph_and_properties(): | ||
"""Test DomainNameResolver when DataHubGraph returns properties with name""" | ||
resolver = DomainNameResolver() | ||
domain_urn = Urn.from_string("urn:li:domain:marketing-domain") | ||
|
||
# Mock DataHubGraph that returns domain properties with a friendly name | ||
mock_graph = Mock() | ||
mock_properties = DomainPropertiesClass(name="Marketing Domain") | ||
mock_graph.get_aspect.return_value = mock_properties | ||
|
||
entity_name = resolver.get_entity_name(domain_urn, mock_graph) | ||
|
||
# Should call get_aspect with correct parameters | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. these comments + docstrings are a bit overzealous. in general, comments should add new information and not just reexplain individual lines of code |
||
mock_graph.get_aspect.assert_called_once_with( | ||
str(domain_urn), DomainPropertiesClass | ||
) | ||
|
||
# Should return the friendly name from properties | ||
assert entity_name == "Marketing Domain" | ||
Comment on lines
+38
to
+75
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. these two tests look extremely similar - can you reduce the code duplication? |
||
|
||
|
||
def test_domain_name_resolver_with_graph_and_empty_string_name(): | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. this test is also not necessary imo |
||
"""Test DomainNameResolver when domain properties has empty string name""" | ||
resolver = DomainNameResolver() | ||
domain_urn = Urn.from_string("urn:li:domain:marketing-domain") | ||
|
||
# Mock DataHubGraph that returns domain properties with empty string name | ||
mock_graph = Mock() | ||
mock_properties = DomainPropertiesClass( | ||
name="" | ||
) # Empty string should be treated as falsy | ||
mock_graph.get_aspect.return_value = mock_properties | ||
|
||
entity_name = resolver.get_entity_name(domain_urn, mock_graph) | ||
|
||
# Should fallback to the domain ID from the URN | ||
assert entity_name == "marketing-domain" | ||
|
||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
these tests look extremely verbose - I was expecting something more like ~50 lines of code for the tests