Skip to content

Conversation

@dpanchenko
Copy link

No description provided.

@sa-github-api
Copy link

Dear @dpanchenko,

In order to potentially merge your code in this open-source repository and therefore proceed with your contribution, we need to have your approval on DFINITY's CLA.

If you decide to agree with it, please visit this issue and read the instructions there. Once you have signed it, re-trigger the workflow on this PR to see if your code can be merged.

— The DFINITY Foundation

Copy link

@timohanke timohanke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can use List.toIter instead of the entries function defined here. It is the same code, but just because List.toIter already exists we don't need to provide it a second time.

@dpanchenko dpanchenko requested a review from timohanke July 22, 2024 23:41
@dpanchenko dpanchenko marked this pull request as ready for review July 22, 2024 23:41
Copy link

@timohanke timohanke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@timohanke
Copy link

Resolves #581

@timohanke
Copy link

I don't know about the size requirement for keys() and vals(). Does anyone know if it is really O(1)?

@ggreif ggreif changed the title feat: add keys() and vals() for AssocList feat: add keys() and vals() for AssocList Oct 31, 2024
@ggreif ggreif changed the title feat: add keys() and vals() for AssocList feat: add keys() and vals() for AssocList Oct 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants