You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The blank samples (replicate = "blank") need to be directly associated with samples that they "belong" to. So we need to create a new entry in the ontology and "property" in the ttl files for this ... maybe?
a blank will need to be a special type of sample - are we doing that now? currently it is a "blank" replicate type - have we formalised this definition in our emo bon vocab?
A blank is associated with an event because it has the same event ID, but in fact a blank should be associated with samples - there being more than one sample for an event. For water, a blank also has a size_frac_low in its mat_samp_id and this is what can be used to associated the blank with a "real" sample. For sediment it is both the size_frac_low and the comp_samp that should be used to make that association, however as the size_frac_low is often "NA" we have to have a joint think about this to avoid associating blanks incorrectly with more than one sample. For arms the event id should be enough to make the association, as a blank is taken for a single arms unit at a single time
This is so that if someone wants to find a blank for a certain sample via our triples, they can say "give me the blanks for this sample"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The blank samples (replicate = "blank") need to be directly associated with samples that they "belong" to. So we need to create a new entry in the ontology and "property" in the ttl files for this ... maybe?
This is so that if someone wants to find a blank for a certain sample via our triples, they can say "give me the blanks for this sample"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: