Skip to content

Conversation

@imstevenpmwork
Copy link
Collaborator

@imstevenpmwork imstevenpmwork commented Jan 8, 2026

Type / Scope

  • Type: Feature | Chore
  • Scope: Robots & Teleoperators

Summary / Motivation

  • Now the Bi SO robot definition is able to be either SO100 or SO101 setups without the need of new code

Related issues

What changed

  • Bi SO implementation now uses the SO base class (which works for both SO100 & SO101)
  • Headers, Documentation & BiSO robot code to have a base class.

How was this tested

  • pytest -vv tests/
  • TBD Manual HW checks

Checklist (required before merge)

  • Linting/formatting run (pre-commit run -a)
  • All tests pass locally (pytest)
  • Documentation updated
  • CI is green

Reviewer notes

  • N/A

@imstevenpmwork imstevenpmwork self-assigned this Jan 8, 2026
@github-actions github-actions bot added the robots Issues concerning robots HW interfaces label Jan 8, 2026
CarolinePascal
CarolinePascal previously approved these changes Jan 8, 2026
Copy link
Collaborator

@CarolinePascal CarolinePascal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM !

@github-actions github-actions bot added documentation Improvements or fixes to the project’s docs examples Issues related to the examples labels Jan 9, 2026
@HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev

The docs for this PR live here. All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or fixes to the project’s docs examples Issues related to the examples robots Issues concerning robots HW interfaces

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants