-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: revamp mnemonic and key file logic #123
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes refactor key file generation and management across multiple components. The previous dedicated key file generator is removed, and its functionality is incorporated into configuration and initialization flows. Pointers are now used for key files with a new package offering a structured JSON-based key management approach. Simultaneously, constants and configuration paths have been updated, and the clipboard functionality alongside clickable UI elements for mnemonic display have been removed. Minor adjustments are also made in balance initialization and bot mapping. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant UI as User Interface
participant Setup as SetupOPInitBots
participant Context as Context Package
participant KeyFile as KeyFile Manager
participant Storage as Filesystem
UI->>Setup: Trigger update (setup complete)
Setup->>Context: GetOPInitKeyFileJson(ctx)
Context-->>Setup: Return keyFilePath
Setup->>KeyFile: Load(keyFilePath)
KeyFile-->>Setup: Loaded key data
Setup->>KeyFile: AddMnemonic(botName, mnemonic)
Setup->>KeyFile: Write(keyFilePath)
KeyFile-->>Setup: Write confirmation
Setup->>UI: Display message "Mnemonic stored at key file"
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
models/minitia/launch.go (1)
2873-2876
: Enhance path security for sensitive files.While the file permissions are correctly set to 0600, consider adding path validation to prevent directory traversal attacks.
Add path validation before writing sensitive files:
+func isValidPath(path string) error { + if strings.Contains(path, "..") { + return fmt.Errorf("path contains invalid sequences") + } + clean := filepath.Clean(path) + if !strings.HasPrefix(clean, filepath.Clean(userHome)) { + return fmt.Errorf("path escapes user home directory") + } + return nil +} configFilePath = filepath.Join(userHome, common.WeaveDataDirectory, LaunchConfigFilename) +if err = isValidPath(configFilePath); err != nil { + return ui.NonRetryableErrorLoading{Err: fmt.Errorf("invalid config file path: %v", err)} +} if err = os.WriteFile(configFilePath, configBz, 0600); err != nil { return ui.NonRetryableErrorLoading{Err: fmt.Errorf("failed to write config file: %v", err)} }
🧹 Nitpick comments (9)
models/opinit_bots/setup.go (2)
505-506
: Minor user-facing message improvement.
The continuity of the message is fine. You might optionally explain how to retrieve the mnemonic from the key file to reduce user confusion.
1408-1409
: Concise user prompt.
Appending “Press enter to go next step” is helpful. Consider clarifying the next step’s name for even better guidance.io/keyfile.go (1)
9-14
: Add documentation for the KeyFile type and constructor.Consider adding documentation to explain the purpose and usage of the KeyFile type and its constructor. This will help other developers understand how to use this package effectively.
Add this documentation:
+// KeyFile represents a JSON-based key-value store for managing mnemonics. type KeyFile map[string]string +// NewKeyFile creates and returns a new empty KeyFile instance. func NewKeyFile() *KeyFile {models/opinit_bots/config.go (1)
62-102
: Consider improving error handling.The function returns an empty key file pointer on error, which could lead to nil pointer dereferences if not handled properly by callers. Consider returning
nil
instead to make error cases more explicit.Apply this diff to improve error handling:
- return &weaveio.KeyFile{}, fmt.Errorf("failed to generate bridge executor mnemonic: %w", err) + return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to generate bridge executor mnemonic: %w", err) - return &weaveio.KeyFile{}, fmt.Errorf("failed to generate output submitter mnemonic: %w", err) + return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to generate output submitter mnemonic: %w", err) - return &weaveio.KeyFile{}, fmt.Errorf("failed to generate batch submitter mnemonic: %w", err) + return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to generate batch submitter mnemonic: %w", err) - return &weaveio.KeyFile{}, fmt.Errorf("failed to generate oracle bridge executor mnemonic: %w", err) + return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to generate oracle bridge executor mnemonic: %w", err) - return &weaveio.KeyFile{}, fmt.Errorf("failed to generate challenger mnemonic: %w", err) + return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to generate challenger mnemonic: %w", err) - return &weaveio.KeyFile{}, fmt.Errorf("unsupported bot name: %s", botName) + return nil, fmt.Errorf("unsupported bot name: %s", botName)models/opinit_bots/bots.go (1)
50-56
: LGTM! Consider using this map to simplify key name lookups.The map provides a clear relationship between bot names and key names. Consider refactoring the
BotInfos
array to use this map for key name lookups, which would reduce duplication and make maintenance easier.Example refactor for
BotInfos
:var BotInfos = []BotInfo{ { BotName: BridgeExecutor, - KeyName: BridgeExecutorKeyName, + KeyName: string(BotNameToKeyName[BridgeExecutor]), // ... rest of the fields }, // ... similar changes for other entries }models/initialize.go (1)
234-238
: Consider improving error handling for home directory access.While the error handling is present, consider wrapping the error with more context about why we need the home directory.
- m.HandlePanic(fmt.Errorf("failed to get user home directory: %w", err)) + m.HandlePanic(fmt.Errorf("failed to get user home directory for storing mnemonic: %w", err))models/minitia/launch.go (3)
2481-2549
: LGTM! The mnemonic display changes improve security by removing clipboard functionality.The removal of clickable items and clipboard functionality reduces the attack surface by preventing potential clipboard hijacking. The simplified display using
RenderKey
is a cleaner approach.Consider adding a warning message about not taking screenshots of the mnemonic phrases, as they might be stored in cloud backups. Example:
viewText := m.WrapView(state.weave.Render() + "\n" + styles.BoldUnderlineText("Important", styles.Yellow) + "\n" + - styles.Text(fmt.Sprintf("Note that these mnemonic phrases along with other configuration details will be stored in %s after the launch process. You can revisit them anytime.", configFilePath), styles.Yellow) + "\n\n" + + styles.Text(fmt.Sprintf("Note that these mnemonic phrases along with other configuration details will be stored in %s after the launch process. You can revisit them anytime.\nWarning: Do not take screenshots of these phrases as they may be stored in cloud backups.", configFilePath), styles.Yellow) + "\n\n" + mnemonicText + styles.RenderPrompt(m.GetQuestion(), []string{"`continue`"}, styles.Question) + m.TextInput.View())
2924-2929
: Improve error message clarity for end users.The error handling is robust, but the error messages could be more user-friendly.
Consider providing more descriptive error messages:
if err = launchCmd.Wait(); err != nil { if err != nil { - *streamingLogs = append(*streamingLogs, fmt.Sprintf("Launch command finished with error: %v", err)) - return ui.NonRetryableErrorLoading{Err: fmt.Errorf("command execution failed: %v", err)} + userMsg := "Failed to launch the rollup. Please ensure you have sufficient permissions and resources." + *streamingLogs = append(*streamingLogs, fmt.Sprintf("%s\nTechnical details: %v", userMsg, err)) + return ui.NonRetryableErrorLoading{Err: fmt.Errorf("%s\nDetails: %v", userMsg, err)} } }
1-3118
: Consider splitting this large file for better maintainability.The file is quite large (3000+ lines) and handles multiple responsibilities. Consider splitting it into smaller, focused files:
- Key management logic
- Configuration handling
- Launch process
- UI components
Suggested structure:
models/minitia/ launch.go # Main launch coordination key_management.go # Key generation and recovery config.go # Configuration handling ui/ display.go # UI components prompts.go # User prompts
This would improve maintainability and make the code easier to test and review.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
cmd/opinit_bots.go
(6 hunks)common/constants.go
(2 hunks)config/config.go
(1 hunks)config/config_test.go
(1 hunks)context/path.go
(1 hunks)io/filesystem.go
(0 hunks)io/keyfile.go
(1 hunks)models/initialize.go
(4 hunks)models/minitia/launch.go
(3 hunks)models/minitia/state.go
(1 hunks)models/opinit_bots/bots.go
(1 hunks)models/opinit_bots/config.go
(2 hunks)models/opinit_bots/init.go
(4 hunks)models/opinit_bots/setup.go
(4 hunks)models/relayer/init.go
(4 hunks)styles/text.go
(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- io/filesystem.go
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Run Integration Tests on Ubuntu
🔇 Additional comments (32)
models/opinit_bots/setup.go (8)
475-479
: Approved for key file writing flow.
The logic of writing to disk and error handling looks correct.
491-491
: Consistent retrieval of OPinit key file path.
RetrievingkeyFilePath
in the same manner as above ensures consistency across the codebase.
492-495
: Graceful error handling.
Good job handling the potential filepath retrieval error and invokingm.HandlePanic(...)
.
501-501
: Consider defensive checks on string splitting.
Similar to the previous block, indexingaddress[1]
could cause an out-of-range error ifstrings.Split(...)
returns fewer than 2 entries.
515-517
: Function refactor looks good.
Replacing mnemonic rendering with address rendering and removing extra parameters aligns with the new approach of focusing on addresses.
1390-1390
: Conditional check for Oracle bot key presence.
Ensuring!oracleBotInfo.IsNewKey()
is consistent with the feature logic.
1393-1396
: Error handling for key file path retrieval.
This block is consistent with the approach used elsewhere.
1403-1403
: Duplicate splitting concern.
As with previous code segments, indexingaddress[1]
requires a length check if there's any chance the split might fail.models/opinit_bots/init.go (2)
1527-1535
: Pointer-based key file usage for the Challenger.
Similar to the executor flow, switching fromKeyFile
to*io.KeyFile
plus calls toOPInitRecoverKeyFromMnemonic
helps unify key management. This appears correct and consistent.
1454-1474
: Migrated to pointer-based key file usage for the Executor.
The function signature now takes*io.KeyFile
and callsOPInitRecoverKeyFromMnemonic
for each key. This approach is consistent with the new pointer-based logic across the PR. Ensure each call handles errors properly, and consider verifying that the correct mnemonic is returned bykeyFile.GetMnemonic(...)
.To confirm correct usage and references, check all invocations of
OPInitRecoverKeyFromMnemonic
:✅ Verification successful
Pointer-based key file usage and error handling in executor initialization verified
- All calls to
cosmosutils.OPInitRecoverKeyFromMnemonic
correctly use the pointer-based key file (keyFile.GetMnemonic(...)
), and each call properly checks and returns errors.- The invocation in both
models/opinit_bots/init.go
andmodels/opinit_bots/setup.go
follows the updated pattern consistently.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Searching for calls to OPInitRecoverKeyFromMnemonic across codebase rg -A 2 'OPInitRecoverKeyFromMnemonic'Length of output: 2554
common/constants.go (3)
5-5
: New config file constant.
DefiningWeaveConfigFile
improves clarity by centralizing the config path reference.
22-25
: Additional constants to support OPinit.
IntroducingOPinitDirectory
,OPinitAppName
,OPinitKeyFileJson
, and reintroducingOpinitGeneratedKeyFilename
clarifies code references for OPinit’s home, binary, and key file structure.
29-29
: Hermes key file path.
DefiningHermesKeyFileJson
as a new constant helps keep key file usage consistent across Hermes integrations.config/config_test.go (1)
43-43
: LGTM!The change correctly uses the common.WeaveConfigFile constant for path construction.
context/path.go (1)
76-82
: LGTM!The new function follows the established pattern and includes proper error handling.
config/config.go (1)
22-22
: LGTM!The change correctly uses the common.WeaveConfigFile constant for path construction.
models/minitia/state.go (1)
138-155
: Verify the impact of empty balances on system functionality.The change to initialize operator and bridge executor addresses with empty balances might affect system functionality. Please ensure that:
- The operator has sufficient funds from other sources to perform operations.
- The bridge executor has sufficient funds to execute bridge operations.
Run the following script to check for any references to these balances in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Impact of Empty Genesis Balances Appears Minimal Based on Code References
- The search results show that both the operator and bridge executor balances are declared and used in the genesis accounts, but there are no explicit checks or balance validations (e.g., conditionals) that would fail if these accounts have empty balances.
- Test comments in
models/minitia/state_test.go
reference non-empty values (e.g., "100operator" and "200bridge"), indicating that while tests document expected values, the runtime code inFinalizeGenesisAccounts
simply assigns an empty balance formatted withls.gasDenom
.- It’s implied that sufficient funding for these critical accounts is expected to be provided by subsequent processes. No immediate functionality issues arise from initializing these accounts with empty balances in the genesis state.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for references to operator and bridge executor balances # Search for references to operator balance echo "Searching for operator balance references..." rg -A 5 "systemKeyL2OperatorBalance" # Search for references to bridge executor balance echo "Searching for bridge executor balance references..." rg -A 5 "systemKeyL2BridgeExecutorBalance" # Search for balance checks or requirements echo "Searching for balance requirements..." ast-grep --pattern 'if $balance { $$$ }'Length of output: 3100
styles/text.go (1)
223-227
: LGTM! Function simplified for better security.The removal of mnemonic display functionality is a good security improvement, as it prevents accidental exposure of sensitive information in the UI.
models/initialize.go (5)
6-7
: LGTM! Required imports added for file operations.The added imports "os" and "path/filepath" are necessary for handling file paths and accessing the user's home directory.
187-191
: LGTM! Simplified struct with better user guidance.The struct has been streamlined by:
- Removing the
Clickable
field to simplify UI interaction- Adding a
question
field for clearer user guidance
193-202
: LGTM! Improved initialization with proper validation.The function has been enhanced with:
- Simplified initialization without clickable component
- Clear question text for better UX
- Proper input validation using
ValidateExactString
208-210
: LGTM! Simplified initialization.The function has been streamlined by removing unnecessary UI component initialization.
212-225
: LGTM! Streamlined update logic.The function has been improved by:
- Removing clickable component handling
- Maintaining proper state management
- Correctly handling text input updates
cmd/opinit_bots.go (4)
18-18
: LGTM! Added import for key file handling.The added import
weaveio
is necessary for the new key file management functionality.
150-150
: LGTM! Updated to use new IO utility.Updated to use
weaveio.FileOrFolderExists
for consistent file existence checking across the codebase.
214-223
: LGTM! Improved key file handling.The function has been enhanced with:
- Proper pointer-based key file handling
- Improved error handling with proper initialization
245-246
: LGTM! Consistent pointer-based key file handling.The function signature has been updated to use pointer-based key file handling consistently throughout the codebase.
models/relayer/init.go (4)
581-586
: LGTM! Enhanced struct with key file path handling.The struct has been improved with:
- Added
keyFilePath
field for proper key file management- Added
question
field for better user guidance
588-601
: LGTM! Improved initialization with key file path.The function has been enhanced with:
- Proper key file path initialization
- Maintained input validation
- Clear question text
620-626
: LGTM! Added proper key file handling.The function has been enhanced with:
- Proper key file creation using
weaveio.NewKeyFile
- Added mnemonics for both L1 and L2 relayers
- Proper error handling for key file operations
655-658
: LGTM! Improved view with better user feedback.The function has been enhanced with:
- Simplified view using
RenderKey
- Clear display of key file path
- Better user guidance
Also applies to: 671-674
models/minitia/launch.go (1)
2824-2877
: LGTM! Well-structured configuration management with proper validation.The JSON-based configuration approach with clear structure and validation improves maintainability and reliability. The separation of concerns between key generation, recovery, and configuration management is well-implemented.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🔭 Outside diff range comments (3)
models/minitia/launch.go (2)
2536-2549
: Improve error handling in View method.The error handling in the View method could be improved. Currently, if
os.UserHomeDir()
fails, the error is handled byHandlePanic
, but the method continues execution which could lead to undefined behavior.Consider returning early after error handling:
userHome, err := os.UserHomeDir() if err != nil { - m.HandlePanic(err) + return m.WrapView(state.weave.Render() + "\nError: Failed to get user home directory") }
3034-3036
: Enhance service start error handling.The service start error handling could be improved to provide more context and potential recovery steps.
Consider providing more detailed error information and recovery guidance:
if err = srv.Start(); err != nil { - state.weave.PushPreviousResponse(styles.RenderPreviousResponse(styles.NoSeparator, "Failed to start rollup service", []string{}, fmt.Sprintf("%v", err))) + errMsg := fmt.Sprintf("Failed to start rollup service: %v\nPlease ensure no other instances are running and try again.", err) + state.weave.PushPreviousResponse(styles.RenderPreviousResponse(styles.NoSeparator, errMsg, []string{}, "")) }cmd/opinit_bots.go (1)
350-350
: Fix incorrect flag description.The description for
FlagGenerateKeyFile
is incorrect. It describes the behavior ofFlagKeyFile
instead.- initCmd.Flags().BoolP(FlagGenerateKeyFile, "", false, "Path to key-file.json. Cannot be specified together with --generate-key-file") + initCmd.Flags().BoolP(FlagGenerateKeyFile, "", false, "Generate a new key file. Cannot be specified together with --key-file")
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
models/minitia/launch.go (4)
953-953
: Address the TODO comment.The comment indicates a need to check for duplicate keys, but the implementation is missing.
Would you like me to help implement the duplicate key check functionality? This is important for preventing potential key reuse issues.
2438-2438
: Consider making the sleep duration configurable.The hardcoded sleep duration of 1500ms might not be optimal for all environments.
Consider making this configurable:
+const defaultKeyGenerationDelay = 1500 * time.Millisecond + func generateOrRecoverSystemKeys(ctx context.Context) tea.Cmd { return func() tea.Msg { // ... - time.Sleep(1500 * time.Millisecond) + time.Sleep(defaultKeyGenerationDelay)
2773-2781
: Improve error message specificity in EncodeToBase64.The error message could be more descriptive to help with debugging.
Consider providing more context in the error message:
func (sp *ScanPayload) EncodeToBase64() (string, error) { jsonBytes, err := json.Marshal(sp) if err != nil { - return "", fmt.Errorf("failed to marshal struct: %w", err) + return "", fmt.Errorf("failed to marshal ScanPayload to JSON: %w", err) }
2904-2906
: Consider making the log buffer size configurable.The log buffer size is hardcoded to 10 entries, which might not be suitable for all use cases.
Consider making this configurable:
+const defaultLogBufferSize = 10 + func launchingMinitia(ctx context.Context, streamingLogs *[]string) tea.Cmd { // ... - if len(*streamingLogs) > 10 { - *streamingLogs = (*streamingLogs)[1:] + if len(*streamingLogs) > defaultLogBufferSize { + *streamingLogs = (*streamingLogs)[1:] }cmd/opinit_bots.go (1)
179-183
: Standardize error wrapping pattern.The error wrapping is inconsistent. Line 179 uses
fmt.Errorf
with%v
, while line 183 uses%w
. Standardize on using%w
for error wrapping to preserve the error chain.- return fmt.Errorf("error generating keyfile: %v", err) + return fmt.Errorf("error generating keyfile: %w", err)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
cmd/opinit_bots.go
(6 hunks)models/minitia/launch.go
(3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Run Integration Tests on Ubuntu
🔇 Additional comments (2)
cmd/opinit_bots.go (2)
18-18
: LGTM! Clean import aliasing.Good practice using an alias for the weaveio package to avoid confusion with the standard io package.
150-150
: LGTM! Consistent use of weaveio package for file operations.Good refactoring to use centralized file operations from the weaveio package. This improves maintainability and consistency across the codebase.
Also applies to: 187-187, 224-230
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
cmd/opinit_bots.go (1)
242-260
: Add error handling for unknown bot types.The
initializeBotWithConfig
function should handle unknown bot types to prevent potential panics.Apply this diff to improve error handling:
func initializeBotWithConfig(cmd *cobra.Command, fileData []byte, keyFile *weaveio.KeyFile, opInitHome, userHome, botName string) error { var err error switch botName { case "executor": var config opinit_bots.ExecutorConfig err = json.Unmarshal(fileData, &config) if err != nil { return err } err = opinit_bots.InitializeExecutorWithConfig(config, keyFile, opInitHome, userHome) case "challenger": var config opinit_bots.ChallengerConfig err = json.Unmarshal(fileData, &config) if err != nil { return err } err = opinit_bots.InitializeChallengerWithConfig(config, keyFile, opInitHome, userHome) + default: + return fmt.Errorf("unknown bot type: %s", botName) } if err != nil { return err }
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
cmd/opinit_bots.go (1)
211-220
:⚠️ Potential issueFix potential nil pointer dereference.
The
readAndUnmarshalKeyFile
function could lead to a nil pointer dereference if the JSON data is empty or malformed.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
func readAndUnmarshalKeyFile(keyFilePath string) (*weaveio.KeyFile, error) { fileData, err := os.ReadFile(keyFilePath) if err != nil { return nil, err } - var keyFile *weaveio.KeyFile + keyFile := &weaveio.KeyFile{} err = json.Unmarshal(fileData, &keyFile) return keyFile, err }
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
cmd/opinit_bots.go (1)
174-184
: Improve error handling and memory management.The error handling in the key file generation block could be more concise and memory-efficient.
Apply this diff to improve the code:
var keyFile *weaveio.KeyFile if isGenerateKeyFile { keyPath := filepath.Join(userHome, common.WeaveDataDirectory, fmt.Sprintf("%s.%s.keyfile", common.OpinitGeneratedKeyFilename, botName)) - keyFile, err = opinit_bots.GenerateMnemonicKeyfile(botName) - if err != nil { - return fmt.Errorf("error generating keyfile: %v", err) - } - err = keyFile.Write(keyPath) - if err != nil { - return fmt.Errorf("error writing to file: %w", err) + if keyFile, err = opinit_bots.GenerateMnemonicKeyfile(botName); err != nil { + return fmt.Errorf("error generating keyfile: %v", err) + } + if err = keyFile.Write(keyPath); err != nil { + return fmt.Errorf("error writing to file: %w", err) }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
cmd/opinit_bots.go
(6 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
cmd/opinit_bots.go (2)
18-18
: LGTM!The import alias
weaveio
is appropriately used to avoid naming conflicts with the standardio
package.
228-229
: LGTM!The file operations are correctly using the
weaveio
package's functions for consistent error handling.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
cmd/opinit_bots.go (1)
348-350
: Fix incorrect flag descriptions.The descriptions for
--key-file
and--generate-key-file
flags appear to be swapped.- initCmd.Flags().String(FlagKeyFile, "", "Use this flag to generate the bot keys. Cannot be specified together with --key-file") - initCmd.Flags().BoolP(FlagGenerateKeyFile, "", false, "Path to key-file.json. Cannot be specified together with --generate-key-file") + initCmd.Flags().String(FlagKeyFile, "", "Path to key-file.json. Cannot be specified together with --generate-key-file") + initCmd.Flags().BoolP(FlagGenerateKeyFile, "", false, "Use this flag to generate the bot keys. Cannot be specified together with --key-file")
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
cmd/opinit_bots.go (2)
228-230
: Consider improving error handling for file operations.The error from
DeleteDirectory
could be more descriptive. Consider wrapping it with additional context about what failed during the deletion.- err := weaveio.DeleteDirectory(dbPath) - if err != nil { - return fmt.Errorf("failed to delete %s", dbPath) - } + if err := weaveio.DeleteDirectory(dbPath); err != nil { + return fmt.Errorf("failed to delete database directory at %s: %w", dbPath, err) + }
174-184
: Improve error handling in key file generation.The error handling could be more concise and consistent. Consider combining the error checks and using
%w
for error wrapping to preserve the error chain.- keyFile, err = opinit_bots.GenerateMnemonicKeyfile(botName) - if err != nil { - return fmt.Errorf("error generating keyfile: %v", err) - } - err = keyFile.Write(keyPath) - if err != nil { - return fmt.Errorf("error writing to file: %w", err) - } + keyFile, err = opinit_bots.GenerateMnemonicKeyfile(botName) + if err != nil { + return fmt.Errorf("failed to generate keyfile for %s: %w", botName, err) + } + if err := keyFile.Write(keyPath); err != nil { + return fmt.Errorf("failed to write keyfile to %s: %w", keyPath, err) + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
cmd/opinit_bots.go
(6 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Run Integration Tests on Ubuntu
🔇 Additional comments (2)
cmd/opinit_bots.go (2)
18-18
: LGTM!Good practice using an alias for the weave IO package to avoid confusion with the standard
io
package.
211-220
: LGTM!The function has been correctly updated to use pointer semantics, which is more efficient for large structs. The initialization of
keyFile
before unmarshaling also prevents potential nil pointer dereference issues.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Description
Closes: #XXXX
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow-up issues.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor
Style