Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CU-86bzn78dn - Build issue in the Main branch #280

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 22, 2024

Conversation

sushantpatil1214
Copy link
Collaborator

@sushantpatil1214 sushantpatil1214 commented Jul 19, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced build scripts to allow users to specify a tag for builds via command-line arguments, defaulting to "ci-test-main" if none are provided.
    • Improved flexibility in the UI and backend build processes by dynamically adapting to different tags.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Resolved issues related to tag passing in the build commands to ensure consistent versioning.
  • Chores

    • Streamlined the handling of the CI variable in build processes for improved maintainability and flexibility.

@rcrichton
Copy link
Member

Task linked: CU-86bzn78dn Build issue in the Main branch

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 19, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@sushantpatil1214 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 15 minutes and 24 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6f7d7cc and bc5855e.

Walkthrough

The recent updates to the build scripts enhance modularity and flexibility by allowing users to specify build tags through command-line arguments, defaulting to "ci-test-main" when none are provided. Additionally, a new variable CI was introduced for improved maintainability across build commands. These enhancements support better version control and adaptability in the build process while preserving the scripts' core structure.

Changes

Files Change Summary
JeMPI_Apps/build-all-java.sh, Introduced conditional logic for tag_to_use, defaulting to "ci-test-main." Updated build commands to include CI TAG=$tag_to_use.
JeMPI_Apps/build-all-ui.sh Added conditional logic for tag_to_use with a default of "ci-test-main." Updated build-image.sh invocation to use TAG=$tag_to_use.
JeMPI_Apps/build-all-ci.sh Introduced a new variable CI, defaulting to true if not defined, replacing hardcoded instances across build commands.

Poem

In the scripts where builds do play,
A tag is set, come what may!
With options wide, a choice to choose,
Flexibility, we gladly use!
Hopping through versions, oh what fun,
Our builds are brighter, one by one! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 06ba590 and 1a67f59.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • JeMPI_Apps/build-all-java.sh (1 hunks)
  • JeMPI_Apps/build-all-ui.sh (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
JeMPI_Apps/build-all-ui.sh (2)

5-9: LGTM! Conditional mechanism for setting tag_to_use is well-implemented.

The code correctly sets a default value for tag_to_use if no command-line arguments are provided.


12-12: LGTM! Invocation of build-image.sh with the TAG environment variable is correct.

The TAG environment variable is correctly set and passed to build-image.sh, ensuring flexibility in the build process.

JeMPI_Apps/build-all-java.sh (2)

9-13: LGTM! Conditional mechanism for setting tag_to_use is well-implemented.

The code correctly sets a default value for tag_to_use if no command-line arguments are provided.


20-41: LGTM! Build commands with CI=false TAG=$tag_to_use prefix are correct.

The CI=false TAG=$tag_to_use prefix is correctly added to the build commands, ensuring that the specified tag is passed to the build process.

Copy link
Contributor

@martino-jembi martino-jembi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@MatthewErispe On both files I'm just not sure about hardcoding that CI value. If that's not an issue then this is good to go.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sushantpatil1214 If we hardcode the CI flag like this, wouldn't that cause issues with other flows, like Platform / CI flows? Thinking it might be better to declare it once at the top of the file and check if it's set? For example:

CI=${CI:-false}
if [ $# -eq 0 ]; then
    tag_to_use="ci-test-main" 
else
    tag_to_use=$1
fi

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@sushantpatil1214 sushantpatil1214 Jul 19, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@martino-jembi
Already same hard-coded inbuild-all-ci.shfile. I don't think it will impact.
But it sounds good to me.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1a67f59 and 6e979b9.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • JeMPI_Apps/build-all-ci.sh (2 hunks)
  • JeMPI_Apps/build-all-java.sh (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • JeMPI_Apps/build-all-java.sh
Additional comments not posted (2)
JeMPI_Apps/build-all-ci.sh (2)

6-6: Good practice: Introduce a default variable.

The introduction of the CI variable with a default value of true enhances maintainability and flexibility.


29-53: Consistent usage of the CI variable.

The usage of the CI variable in the build commands ensures consistency and maintainability.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6e979b9 and 6f7d7cc.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • JeMPI_Apps/build-all-ci.sh (2 hunks)
  • JeMPI_Apps/build-all-java.sh (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • JeMPI_Apps/build-all-ci.sh
  • JeMPI_Apps/build-all-java.sh

@MatthewErispe MatthewErispe merged commit 1e3cdb0 into main Jul 22, 2024
5 checks passed
@MatthewErispe MatthewErispe deleted the CU-86bzn78dn_Build-issue-in-the-Main-branch branch July 22, 2024 13:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants